In this dymaic world, society is bound to evolve for which it needs to overcome challenges it faces. Problems they face can range from racial discrimination to undeveloped sewer systems to outdated education policies, to what not. Although technology has become very handy in solving a lot of issues but it is still not a panacea for all of them. Therefore relying only on technology to resolve problems in society is not recommended.
Technology has been around us for not more than a decade or two, before this periods, did society not evolve ? Civil Rights and racial discrimation are social issues which cannot be imagined to be solved by science and machines. It requires human interactions and human acumen to resolve them. Problems where society needs to understand, collaborate and empathize and this plays a major factor in resolving issue, technology will be of little or no help.
However, technology has left an imprint of the lives of human being in a way that today many lives revolve around it. It has been seen as an answer to many root problems. For example, earlier, for voting, people used ballot where citizens would elect a person on a ballot paper and submit it in ballot box and committee would mannually count votes for days. In today's world technology has reduced this mundane labour work and revolutionized a very efficient way of voting through machines.
People look forward to implement technology in as many spheres of life as they can. But it has still not proven to be one stop solution for all. Science is still developing, it is still gaining human intelligence, it is still learning.
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...is still not a panacea for all of them. Therefore relying only on technology to resolve p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r not more than a decade or two, before this periods, did society not evolve ? Civil...
^^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to implementing'.
Suggestion: to implementing
... through machines. People look forward to implement technology in as many spheres of life a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89454545455 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70413190184 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3826071522 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7333333333 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277820028025 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872920216825 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743318382613 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162746470928 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765317043546 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.