Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
In today's cosmopolitan world, technological innovations are an indispensable part of it. But we should be cautious enough to know the consequences of these break-throughs. I agree with the assertion that scientists and researchers should focus more on the areas, where most of our population can benefit rather than helping out a specific class or group of people through their inventions. Following are two reasons and a concession to support this thesis.
Firstly, we live in a world which is majorly driven by the top few powerful people, which define the path in which our society as whole would be moving. They provide us with the temptation of progress, and tantalising us with a better standard of living. While their reasoning is attractive, but on the ground-level it ignores a large section of society which is, even in twentieth century, fighting to put food in their stomach. The scientific research should be primarily driven by the aim of providing a decent and acceptable standard of living for all. The technological advancements, no matter how sophisticated and exorbitant they are, should be accessible to all irrespective of the economic class they belong to. For instance, there are specific initiatives which are working hard to solve the practical problems of food, homelessness and education. Like, during Covid-19 period firms were trying to make vaccines available at lower costs, so that it could be afforded by the developing countries. The authorities should also encourage the research programs, privately or publicly founded, which focuses on providing long-term solutions to the more pragmatic problems. Thus, having a great influence on the major chunk of the population which remains ignored.
Secondly, history has proved that the scientific breakthroughs more frequent to occur during wars. The programs funded to create weapons on mass destruction, which are not only responsible for fatality of millions of people, but also hamper our planet. The amount of money spent on these programs, just a means to show military muscle, should be deviated to a more fruitful research. For example, Manhattan Project undertaken by USA during World War II to drop nuclear bombs on Japan, not only cause cataclysmic destruction but also affected the future generations and environment through toxic radiations. Therefore, concentrating our focus on a progressive approach and sustainable development would be helpful for our planet and consequently to the major population.
Thirdly, some may argue that, just focussing in the betterment of people belonging to the lower economic groups would hamper the scientific and technological development. Like, spending billions of money on space explorations, when our a major part of our society does not have food to eat. Thus, we should be more considerate with our priorities.
Conclusively, we should be narrowing our research areas towards innovations which would be salutary to majority of the population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 58
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 66
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2523.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40256959315 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.085731119 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569593147752 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4203935785 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.681818182 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2272727273 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201335611453 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564302844544 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527628436276 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11782892001 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050658326371 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.