Setting up library to avoild petty theft.
Library is a place where we get knowledge of almost everything for all age type people. According to me there is no relation between petty theft and youngsters not using laboratory. And it is always goof if arrangements made to mix up young and old then only the misconceptions can be cleared.
Modifying library to set up youth is good option because of two main points. First and foremost is If the young ones are not involved in the theft act then after meeting with old the misconception can be cleared. It is good chance for young people to clear their image. Usually they use modern instruments to gain knowledge. E-books are easily available on internet and for this there is no need to go for library. By knowing this concerns of senior can be solved easily.
Secondly, if young’s are involved in thievery then after contact with experienced adulthood. At early ages of life , we are very enthusiastic and playful with this we commit many crimes. These might not be harmful for now but in future this will lead to a malignant life. Change them under adulthood influence is especially important for betterment of their life as well as for the community. Useless act of petty theft has kept seniors in worry. Experience makes humans wiser and calmer. The wise words can change destroyed kids.
If these two aspects are covered under the setting a new library to attract youth then it is good option. Social activities will increase interaction between youth and old. Thievery cases have been increased from last eight months only means whoever is involved in this act is still naïve and can be stopped in early to avoid future problems.
The changes like bringing computers to library will attract the new comers like youth. As whole area is very well planned so this change can bring positive results. The whole community will also have unity with this change.
- Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to. How true is this statement? What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environments? 83
- Some people like to communicate by e mail and voice mail other people like to communicate by telephone or face to face which type of communication do you prefer and why be sure to include specific details and examples to support your opinion 40
- Agree or disagree? Teachers should not make their social and political views known to students in the classroom. (Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion) 76
- novel reader decrease 80
- Does modern technology make life more convenient or was life better when technology was simple? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ost everything for all age type people. According to me there is no relation between petty thef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'goofed'.
Suggestion: goofed
... not using laboratory. And it is always goof if arrangements made to mix up young an...
^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rienced adulthood. At early ages of life , we are very enthusiastic and playful wi...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ise words can change destroyed kids. If these two aspects are covered under the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 323.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82043343653 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5072122001 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.468620217663 125% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8976248786 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.7727272727 119.503703932 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.6818181818 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.70786347227 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149917217896 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04239205236 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679949656438 0.0701772020484 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864633052959 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506491885562 0.0628817314937 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.3799401198 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.3550499002 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.5979740519 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.