Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In a society where sustainability has become a central theme, to the biotic and abiotic ecosystem, ensuring the continued availability of endangered species should be a responsibility of all and sundry irrespective of the cause of potential extinction of the species. The world has continually been faced with climate challenges, a result of the interplay of actions of humans primarily. With this climate challenge, the world has come to the awareness of the potential danger of the lives of some species not being supported or compatible with the environment. In addressing this issue, I will mostly disagree with the notion that society should only make efforts when the potential extinction of an endangered species is solely as an outcome of human activities.
First of all, the ecosystem is a network of all living and non-living things. For the environment to support all kinds of life, it requires the efforts of the current lives in it. If a particular species of animal is on the verge of extinction, the society should make efforts to ensure that the species survives no matter the cause. For instance, the dinosaurs, which history has given an account of living in the past, have been noted to go into extinction as the environment in which they lived could not support the requirements for these big animals. Despite not living in the current world, the gamut of information that has been added to the evolution of man and life in the past is from the findings studying the remnants of these animals. Imagine having such animals still alive, it is possible that they would have been a window into the previous ages and the culture of the past. A society working for the safety of all its members irrespective of the size is a complete one.
Secondly, Newton noted in one of his laws that for every motion, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This maxim can be applied to this issue. How? By making the society conducive and supportive for every form of life, man is ensuring that there is continuity of human existence. A minute appearance of inertness and fecklessness is enough to cause an opposite reaction in which the nonchalant attitude could cause a spiral motion of incompatibility with life even for humans. Some fishes have been identified as endangered species due to the amount of industrial waste generated by companies and disposed into the habitats of these species. Also, some animals have been identified with possible erasure from records due to the wildlife hunters or outcome of infernos in the forest, for instance, the Amazon Forest. With these events, the former example affects humans by producing impure and unclean water, affecting the quality of life of the people while the latter example produces air pollution and inhalation of particles responsible for lung cancers and other non-communicable diseases.
Finally, some may point out that for animals to go to extinction, it is good for the society, for example, some fire breeding dragons with threat to lives on ground. This feature of such animals has been hypothesized as an adaptability measure to survive. Ensuring the environment is conducive for all life forms will promote harmony and good living among all forms of life.
In conclusion, making the environment conducive for all life forms is a responsibility the society should shoulder without any form of prejudice to any species of animals, especially the endangered species. This is because every life form has its relevance and preserving this functionality is a role to be taken up by the highest form of life, that is, human beings as the custodian of the ecosystem.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-02 | Alex Cheng | 54 | view |
2023-09-09 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
2023-07-17 | soap | 50 | view |
2023-07-17 | M1randa | 50 | view |
2023-07-14 | s.sim | 50 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Some people say that the only reason for earning a foreign language Is In order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your own 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3039.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01485148515 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83567162394 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450495049505 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 995.4 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2221155988 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.130434783 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.347826087 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186891373412 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613095586763 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063462995952 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115711035171 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600079379274 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.