Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others

People have different opinions toward each other regarding successful leaders’ criteria. One ‎group believes that a leader should be highly competitive in government, industry or other fields in ‎order to be successful. However, others argue that he or she should be collaborative with others. I ‎mostly align with second group for two reasons, as collaboration brings various perspective, and ‎also brings mutual advantages. Nevertheless, I do concede that, in some cases, being ‎competitive can be motivate leaders to become successful. ‎
First of all, cooperation can bring different points of view on a specific project. These various ‎opinions can be productive as it views one subject from many possible angles. Otherwise, a ‎person, even not narrow-minded, could see only from one side, subsequently, assumes that he ‎will be sure successful if he follows his path which most probably it leads to failure. Moreover, ‎collaboration with others brings different skillful people around a table. As people are not perfect, ‎mostly they lack some skills or lacking a sufficient knowledge in one case, on the other hand ‎some others have more experience on this subject. They can act as complimentary, and resolve ‎other’s difficulties. Therefore, collaboration can lead to success for a leader due to bringing ‎various opinions and skills in one place.‎
Secondly, cooperation can improve and promote healthy relationship with others. For instance, a ‎nation which is independent may face some dilemmas due to geographic restrictions. In this case, ‎foreign policies play an important role by initiating export and import goods between two ‎countries. This approach can be encountered beneficial for both nations as it helps to fulfil their ‎promises in developing countries. Furthermore, a leader can promote their country by working ‎with another nation, and reaching an agreement. For instance, one goal of some countries is to ‎expand their visa-free territory in order to ease the application procedure as well as to encourage ‎more people to visit their country. This can be one goal for a leader if he wishes to promote their ‎culture, or earn money from tourists. Hence, collaboration can be considered as a requirement for ‎a successful leader.‎
However, in some cases, competition can motivate a leader to work harder that usual to bet ‎others. For example, an industry can see other organizations and setting a goal in order to reach ‎or even supersede them. This approach could arise from different in prices, innovations and other ‎tasks. By searching for different ways to earn these aspects, a leader can be motivated to work ‎around a clock and set a goal. In addition, even if this competition ends with a failure, a leader ‎acquires new skill and set of minds to restart the combat. finally, this healthy competition drives a ‎leader to be able to overcome difficulties in different stage of his leadership. Thus, in limited ‎cases, a competition can be Benefield as it encourages leader to try harder.‎
In conclusion, a successful leader should regard collaboration as necessity as it brings various ‎opinions, skills, and mutual benefits. Nonetheless, a healthy competition can be productive for a ‎leader to be successful.‎

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'sufficient knowledge'.
Suggestion: sufficient knowledge
...mostly they lack some skills or lacking a sufficient knowledge in one case, on the other hand ‎some ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 547, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...and set of minds to restart the combat. finally, this healthy competition drives a ‎lea...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2818.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48249027237 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2639397744 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523346303502 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0409975756 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.21951772744 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394805527106 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126893760324 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912304579593 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264161429666 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103846864313 0.0667264976115 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.