The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper quot The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago During this same time

In the argument, the editor concludes that the Batavia government should take action in order to ‎regulate the price of milk. This conclusion is based on several premises, such as increasing the number ‎of dairy farms respect ten years ago. While the author's assertion could prove true, the author should ‎answer three questions to strengthen its validity. ‎

Firstly, was the report by the department of agriculture in Batavia conducted scientifically? It could be ‎possible that the survey, which was done ten years ago, was inaccurate due to a lack of efficient ‎technology, which hindered the surveyors from obtaining data accurately. This could also arise from a ‎lack of expertise in this search area and lead to misleading numbers. Furthermore, it might be possible ‎that, even if there are more farms now than before, more are abandoned and no longer have outcomes. ‎If either scenario proves accurate, the author's contention is significantly weakened. ‎

Secondly, is the price of the involved items, which the farmers use, the same as ten years ago? Maybe ‎the augmenting price of livestock food causes the dairy farms to increase the milk price to survive. ‎Moreover, the gas price may have reached its peak in previous years, which could be responsible for ‎increasing the price of packaging. In addition, the transportation cost would have also changed to cope ‎with this issue. In this situation, the farmers had to increase the prices of milk to maintain their profit. ‎The argument does not hold water if each case proves to be the case. ‎

‎ Finally, is the milk price at Excello Food Market representative of milk prices throughout the region? It ‎might be possible that this market is one of the most expensive markets in the whole region, where ‎many ordinary people would not go. There could be many other shops that have maintained the price of ‎milk at 1.50 dollars like before. Additionally, this market could be on an isolated island, which is not ‎accessible by common trucks; therefore, the cargo ships have to take the products, which leads to an ‎increase in the prices. If the above possibilities turn out to be true, the author's conclusion falls apart. ‎

In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is flawed due to several unwarranted assumptions. If the ‎author can answer the three stated questions, it will be possible to fully evaluate the proposed ‎recommendation's reliability. ‎

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... farms respect ten years ago. While the authors assertion could prove true, the author ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...If either scenario proves accurate, the authors contention is significantly weakened. ‎...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 596, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... possibilities turn out to be true, the authors conclusion falls apart. ‎ In conclus...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20199501247 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92512644158 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561097256858 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6641244952 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142899742595 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473296094876 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061494820184 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842151262535 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624539367009 0.0667264976115 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.