Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether a college student should choose the field of study on the basis of his own talent and interests or this decision should be based on the availability of jobs in that field. In my opinion, considering our own interests and inclinations while choosing the field of study is the most required one. I will argue that, in most of the cases, understanding our own skills and interests weighs more than considering number of jobs available while selecting a particular study field.
Firstly, I will present an example from the scientists community of India to support my argument. Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was inclined towards science, technology, and missiles since from his childhood. But while choosing the field of study in college, his decision of studying Aerospace Engineering was not driven by the availability of jobs in that field, because in 1960s, there were no ISRO or any other esteem organisation to offer jobs in specifically this field. But his decision was driven by his interests and capability which led to the establishment of ISRO and many more successful projects for the country. This example supports my argument and proves that how a decision based on interest rather than job availability culminated to a huge success and respect for a man from India.
Furthermore, I will like to share my personal experience with a friend. When I was pursuing engineering, I had a friend who was also in my batch. He has probably taken engineering because of the immense availability of jobs in this field but he was not at all interested in it. As a result, after the semester result, he performed poorly and after careful introspection he quit the engineering and went for CA which was his actual interest, but could not choose it due to difficulties in getting jobs. Now, when I see him again, as a CA, which was his interest driven choice, he has his own chamber and working successfully and happily. This personal experience shows that how a decision forced on us on the basis of job availability only can lead to disaster which in turn can be proved to success by listening to the voice of our interests and abilities.
However, there may be some cases also where my argument does not hold true. If there is a boy from very poor family and can bear expenses for two time food hardly, and he wishes to choose medical, one of the most expensive study field in India, on the basis of his interests and abilities but his family is unable to pay the fees. Then in this case the decision of selecting study field should have been dependent on other factors also like job availability, fees of course, etc. rather than only his interests. This example shows the possibility of exceptions in the argument.
In conclusion, I believe, the student should carefully introspect his interests and talents also to choose the study field and job availability is not an appropriate criteria for this decision in most of the cases. To bolster my argument, the first example from scientists community and other cases from my personal experience is shared. However, there is some room of exception also evident from the third case presented. In sum, decision of study field should be majorly driven by interests and talents rather than jobs available to enhance personal and collective development .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | mkm462 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | ZHOU0444 | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Sujan Adhikari | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 16
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...lability of jobs in that field, because in 1960s, there were no ISRO or any other esteem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: WILL_LIKE_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'would'?
Suggestion: would
...for a man from India. Furthermore, I will like to share my personal experience wi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
... job availability is not an appropriate criteria for this decision in most of the cases....
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 579, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ance personal and collective development .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, third, while, in conclusion, of course, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2778.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 570.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87368421053 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80454796886 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440350877193 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3297565699 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.782608696 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7826086957 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318321321111 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103499921689 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119717422295 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222357977899 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122278804958 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.