The Issue whether Corporations have responsibility towards society and environment is a contentious one. I believe corporations should obey law and try to make as much money as possible. Because unless corporation make profit, the development is going to halt. Also, if rules and regulation is provided wisely and make corporations follow the rules then both society and corporation can prosper.
First, main goal of a corporation is to earn money. If it focuses on social development, then its primary goal of making money will hamper. Which may lead to destruction of that corporation. For example, big technology company like Facebook, Google is creating advanced technology for us. To create advanced technology, lots of money needs to be invested. If these company focus on social and environmental development, then they might lose their profit and eventually it will hamper their investment in developing higher technology. So, corporations main focus should be making profit not on social development.
Second, if we can impose proper rules and regulations on corporations then we can force them to promote the wellbeing of society and environment. For example, Big manufacturing industry like car companies produce lots of carbon di oxide every day. If we make laws that these company which emit huge amount of CO2 in the environment have to plant trees which produce equal amount of oxygen, then we can prevent greenhouse effect. Again, we can restrict different manufacturing companies to emit industrial wastage to atmosphere and river water by creating strict rules. This in terns will help shaping a better society and environment. So creating prudent laws and regulation can be one way of making corporation invest towards betterment of society and environment.
On the other hand, some people believe that corporation should take responsibility towards society and environment on its own. But the problem with that notion is that which corporation should promote how much is a big question. Again if there are no clear rules and regulation then corporation will not get any guidance how to act for the development of society and environment. For example, we expect big oil companies to invest more to environmental cause. Because they are the one destroying. On the other hand, renewable energy companies should have less burden of ruining our ecology, thus should pay less to social and environmental development. But if we let these company decide for themselves how much they contribute toward society then there is a change that big company which are hampering our environment decide to invest nothing for our society and environment.
In conclusion, even though some people believe that corporations have some responsibility toward society and environment, I believe that if laws and regulation is properly imposed then both society and corporations can be benefited
- gre argument essay 3
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 58
- TPO- test30- burning mirror 68
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 63
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The Issue whether or not Corporations have responsibility toward...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...imary goal of making money will hamper. Which may lead to destruction of that corpora...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
... lots of money needs to be invested. If these company focus on social and environmental devel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...ing higher technology. So, corporations main focus should be making profit not on social d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...i oxide every day. If we make laws that these company which emit huge amount of CO2 in the en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to invest more to environmental cause. Because they are the one destroying. On the oth...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 668, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...nvironmental development. But if we let these company decide for themselves how much they con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31775700935 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04463189683 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443925233645 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.8794225117 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9565217391 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4347826087 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300331364279 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958545349576 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911530677159 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205491926953 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953304218443 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.