Corporations do have a degree of responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. After all, they make their profits off of society, and are successful because people buy and support their products. Therefore, they are ethically bound to give back to society.
It may seem a little unfair to make profit-driven businesses feel compelled to spend labour, and a good portion of their profits, to solve social problems or improve people's lives. After all, that is the government's job! However, businesses often benefit from promoting good causes. The resulting positive publicity serves as good advertising for their products, and bring in profits. Thus, it is not too outlandish to suggest that corporate giants be asked to actively use their advertising resources and power for the betterment of society.
In some cases, corporations need to take action to offset any damage they have caused to society while performing their activities. It is often the case that even when commercial corporations stay within the line of law in their operations, they directly or indirectly affect the environment for generations to come. The oil and petroleum industry is one example. Although it may be legal to drill oil wells, or perform fracking in an oil-rich area, the stability of soil or land is affected. Intensively taking advantage of this may cause drastic problems such as landslides in the future. In this situation, considering an environment-friendly approach, although not legally required, would be the moral thing to do.
Similarly, construction companies that tear down large tracts of forest or farmlands in third world countries may have complete legal rights in carrying out their activities. Yet, in doing so, they may be destroying the livelihood of hundreds or thousands of locals, who depend on forests for sustenance. Though they may not legally bound to do so, it is only fair that the corporations, in this case, should take steps to relocate or provide locals with alternative jobs so that their lives will not be uprooted by commerical activities.
On the other hand, not all corporations are involved in activities that could impact society or the environment negatively. Some of them may just be smaller companies,trying to stay afloat, and make profits. It is not really fair to ask them to get involved with campaigns to improve the environment or be burdened with responsibilities of improving society. It is also dubious, if they could make any substantial positive impact on society, if forced to participate in social welfare campaigns.
In conclusion, corporations are capable of doing a lot to give back to society, and do have an ethical responsibility to promote social welfare activities. Moreover, businesses can only flourish in a society of healthy buyers. Thus, business have sufficient motive to engage in welfare activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , trying
...me of them may just be smaller companies,trying to stay afloat, and make profits. It is...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, really, similarly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, while, after all, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27467811159 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10923101497 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530042918455 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5542813663 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.869565217 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303001622058 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084782737597 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993730858197 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160800567452 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937667250632 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.