Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure
that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that
government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Art can manifest in various mediums, including painting, sculpture, music, dance, literature, theater, film, photography, and more. Adequate funding plays a vital role in nurturing and expanding the artistic landscape in various ways. So, I mostly agree with the belief that government funding is necessary to ensure the flourishing of the arts and its accessibility to all people for several reason.
Many artistic endeavors would be struggled to exist unless adequate funding is provided to them. Artist, particularly in marginal communities, often face financial obstacles that impede their ability to focus fully on their artistic creativity. In the late 20th century and onwards, the advent of digital technology has had a profound impact on the arts. The availability of computer, internet, digital tools revolutionized artistic creation. Hence, it compels the artist to be on equal footing to pull through this competitive market. By providing funding, the government can help level the playing field and create opportunities for artists who might otherwise be overlooked or unable to pursue their artistic aspirations.
In addition, for the production of large scale projects which require significant resources government funding is required. It can benefit both the public and the artist. For instance, ‘Shilpokola art exhibition’ can be organized to showcase and promote artistic talent, cultural diversity and creative expression. It provides artist to display their art to wider audience, allowing them to gain recognition and potentially sell their artwork. These funds can be used to cover various expenses associated with organizing an exhibition.
People are not born with equal facilities. The government funding can encourage the people from each background and promote cultural cohesion. It can, thereby, enrich society as a whole by preserving authenticity of traditional art from diverse background. The art can play a vital role in shaping our identity and facilitating the exchange of idea. So government funding can assure that the facilities of art is accessible to everyone.
There is an argument that government funding can pressurize the integrity of the art. There might be political interference on the freedom of the artist. They claimed that government may dictate the types of art would be worthy of support which will potentially impede the creativity of the artist. These claims have not been convincingly refuted. Therefore equality should be maintained between government funding and artistic autonomy to prevent the deterioration of artistic expression.
The government funding may impair the integrity of the arts yet the pragmatic view demonstrate the necessity to ensure the flourishment and accessibility of arts. In order to restrain the integrity of the art, transparent and independent fund allotment mechanism should be established. It is crucial to safeguard artistic autonomy as well as the diversity of artistic expression. It can be said that, arts and funding share a complex and interconnected relationship, as the financial support available for the arts significantly impacts the accessibility, sustainability and growth of artistic endeavors
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 86
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 75
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...and its accessibility to all people for several reason. Many artistic endeavors would be s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...cale projects which require significant resources government funding is required. It can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ims have not been convincingly refuted. Therefore equality should be maintained between g...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2737.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67842323651 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15505327226 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539419087137 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 860.4 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4315731671 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2142857143 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390460997684 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11913234374 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103951969712 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248840638791 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096428412218 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.