Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
The question of whether the government should fund artistic works or whether the involvement of the government would hinder the integrity of artistic expressions has sparked a considerable debate. I believe a balanced approach should be taken so that artistic talents can flourish and the creative flow of an artist is not also hampered.
First and foremost, government funding in the arts can bring financial stability to this sector, which will help an artist think more creatively without getting interrupted by materialistic needs. Also, there are many organisations that struggle and fail to support their artists properly due to financial limitations. The involvement of the government may help the arts flourish and gift the world with many more innovative works.
Moreover, there are many talented and undiscovered artists who have to leave this field due to financial instability but can be supported by government funds, and one of the supposedly lost talents can be revived and presented to the world as a nation's pride. Due to such funding, many talent hunting programmes can be organised by organisations to find new artists who are capable of making a great contribution to the arts.
Therefore, funding provided by the government can be used to arrange large programmes that will be open to a broader audience, enabling the general public to enjoy the creative innovation done by the artists. That's how the arts will not be confined to an elite group but rather be open to all, resulting in building a sophisticated and cohesive society.
However, government funding can be very helpful in flourishing the arts, but it can have some negative consequences, such as pushing political agendas through such events. So, it is very important to keep some limitations on the extent to which the government fund will be able to influence artistic expressions. The creativity of the artists should be controlled by any group of people.
Also, the secured funding can bring a feeling of extreme stability to organisations and artists, causing them to lose interest in innovation. So, dependency on other private groups or organisations is also essential, rather than getting all the necessary support from the government. This will keep their urge to strive alive, as they would not be able to take the funds for granted.
In conclusion, government funds should be provided to flourish the arts, but regulation is needed to ensure that the funds are utilised properly. Funding should not impact the creativity of the artists. A proper balance can result in opening up art to all and letting artists shine without any additional burdens.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether the government should fund artistic wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...pen to a broader audience, enabling the general public to enjoy the creative innovation done b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...reative innovation done by the artists. Thats how the arts will not be confined to an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17249417249 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91649102117 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494172494172 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8948178851 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.277777778 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32349904234 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106443514174 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057501454158 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168064541144 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600996475543 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.