Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgement.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the modern society, responsibility of the government officials is always in the central of political discussion. Someone believes that political leaders should carry out the will of the people they serve, while other argues that leaders should decide relying on their own judgement. From my perspective of view, I agree with the later considering the comprehensive knowledge and resources possessed by the leaders, while I object to the former as it would bring about several detrimental results.
To start off, I have to concede that when leaders fulfill with the will of the people, they can win more reputation and facilitate their achievement of long term ambition. Because the major liability of political leaders is to construct a better world for the public by achieving their personal dreams. It is reasonable for leaders to fully contemplate with people's wish and add those into their political goals. Through making the people's wishes under to the earth, people could appreciate them from the deep heart and in turn wholeheartedly support their further policy. Such wholesome feedback cycle could facilitate political leaders to acquire more supports and reach their targets in a more smooth way.
However, when we carefully consider the characteristics of wills from the public, whether merely to follow people's wish can promote government officials' efficiency become more complex and needs thorough deliberation. As diversity of people in arbitrary countries, they often raises up distinct ideas and normally those ideas are incompatible with each other. Therefore, this cast a great challenge for leaders how to fulfill them in a logically way. On one hand, it is impossible to make all of them satisfactory as there might exists irreconcilable conflicts between their wishes. Furthermore, as complexity of political tasks normally have, leaders should have a comprehensive and logical schedule for their political plan. But to blindly follow with people's will could definitely disturb such well-ordered plan, as people's ideas and wishes are likely to emerge at any time and change simultaneously. Such instability bring about great challenges for leaders to make better overall plan. In short, the characteristic of people's wills decide that efficient leaders couldn't just follow them and schedule political plan in an systematic way.
Last but not least, as political leaders's personal quality and resources they possess, we have sufficient reasons to trust them and encourage them to depend on their volition, if their ambitions are actually the right track. On one hand, leaders are normally elites who receive better knowledges among the society. Such qualities could guarantee them to have better insight when considering challenges. Take diverse people's requirements as example, it is relatively easier than a polymath political leader to figure out how to balance between different interests and still guarantee the final goal is well on the track. But such challenge would seem a Herculean task for the normal people. Furthermore, with the pre-requisitives that politicians possess the right morality and good will for serving to people, when they consider their own political decision, it is also sensible and reasonable to trust them for putting people's will into the highest priority and vouchsafe their actual achievement. Therefore, in case that their political ambition or plan could be taken into practice, the major consideration involving with the people's personal wills, is capable of reaching the solid ground. From this perspective, trusts for wise political leaders equates with guaranteeing people's will in practice.
In summary, it is beneficial for leaders to follow with people's wills, because those could help them establish a solid foundation for their further achievement. However, this doesn't mean that leaders who only fulfill the public could reach their political goals. Furthermore, as elites from our society and possession of right morality and sufficient knowledges, we should bestow them with sufficient freedom to act with their own decision.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- The following appeared in a health newsletter Nosinia is an herb that many users report to be as effective as prescription medications at fighting allergy symptoms Researchers recently compared Nosinia to a placebo in 95 men and women with seasonal allerg 57
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 79
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a manufacturing company. "During the past year, workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries. Panoply 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...haracteristics of wills from the public, whether merely to follow peoples wish ca...
^^
Line 9, column 435, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('logically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...enge for leaders how to fulfill them in a logically way. On one hand, it is impossible to make ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1068, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...les wills decide that efficient leaders couldnt just follow them and schedule political...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1121, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...follow them and schedule political plan in an systematic way. Last but not least, as political ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...low them and schedule political plan in an systematic way. Last but not least...
^^
Line 17, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...heir further achievement. However, this doesnt mean that leaders who only fulfill the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, in short, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3484.0 2235.4752809 156% => OK
No of words: 634.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4952681388 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01790360848 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86206289838 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476340694006 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1062.9 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6449231314 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.037037037 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4814814815 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205273111486 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659676170869 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629559964855 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147950942436 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611082224375 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.