Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for
personal growth. Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies
too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively.
The contention is that “the challenging situation is an opportunity for personal growth and reimaging challenging situations for facing the challenging situation efficiently." Admittedly, challenging situations ameliorate personal growth. However, there are several nuances that need to be considered when deciding which view to pursue. On balance, it is imperative, from my point of view, that challenging situations improve personal growth. Therefore, I mostly agree with the view of improving personal growth.
To begin with, the first and foremost point that comes to mind is that challenging situations help to find gaps in knowledge and skills. For a supporting example, one need to look no further than the fact of the thesis, where if a model is trained with a machine learning algorithm, it provides a good result; on the other hand, when it tries with a deep learning algorithm, it may provide less accuracy, which challenges one to understand the gap for the deep learning method. Moreover, the second vital point is that challenging situations act as an experience for the future. If we pay attention to the fact that schoolchildren have been trained to become sangfroid in difficult situations, this will help them become equanimous in many difficult situations in the future. From the above scenario, it is evident that challenging situations help improve personal growth.
To further understand, the crucial fact that should be taken into consideration is that challenging situations may have long-term benefits. I would like to point out a vivid example of Kuwait, when Kuwait was attacked by Iraq in 1990. Then they focused on their military section, especially. Similary, reimaging challenging situations may not be the same in real life as imagined. Let's take an example: if an authority decides to change its education system, consider all its countereffects. It may present some other extra problem that was not taken into consideration before. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that challenging situations help with improvement.
On the contrary, under some circumstances, reimagining challenging situations helps to face the real troubles effectively. For example, the military demo training in their camp helps them survive in real war. However, this reason does not constitute sufficient support for the claim because, in real war, the real scenario may not be the same as the training session. Moreover, reimagining challenging situations helps with better early planning. To illustrate that, consider a company’s future planning for the next 10 years or above, which will help them to face any situation that they are considering.
In a nutshell, due to the aforementioned reasons and examples, it is demonstrated that reimagining challenging situations helps to face the challenging situation effectively, but when it is considered in broad eyes, the real scenario is just the opposite, where challenging situations make someone more perfect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-29 | Mirza Raquib | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | Mirza Raquib | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | TiOluwani97 | 83 | view |
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 50
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 70
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
The contention is that “the challenging situation is an opportun...
^
Line 8, column 382, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...t be the same in real life as imagined. Lets take an example: if an authority decide...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for example, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51409978308 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15693127949 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492407809111 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1934733491 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.545454545 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471539147886 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151612975874 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118515484665 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2949211434 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888125579167 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
The contention is that “the challenging situation is an opportun...
^
Line 8, column 382, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...t be the same in real life as imagined. Lets take an example: if an authority decide...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for example, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51409978308 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15693127949 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492407809111 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1934733491 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.545454545 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471539147886 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151612975874 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118515484665 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2949211434 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888125579167 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.