When talking about leadership, there are always two diverting opinions: someone claims that the government leader should succumb to the public’s opinion, while others argue that the government leader needs to insist his own principles and objections. In my perspective, however, the government leader should always consult public opinions when formulating important policies. Nevertheless, it is not reasonable to carry people’s will unquestioningly because people are often divided and poorly informed when facing important issues.
Before going to detail discussion, we need to give a definition of the word effective leaders. An effective government leader means the leader can make decisions that benefit most people at the same time make fewer mistakes when making decisions.
Firstly, I believe that the government leader should consult the public frequently and systematically before making important decisions. For one thing that the effective leaders’ job is to develop relevant policies in order to meet the needs of people. And people know what the need and what they want better than anyone else. Listening to the public will help the government leader make a fitting decision to improve a certain situation. For another, listening to public will on the proposed policy will further legitimize the policy and make it easy for the government to later enforce the policy.
On the other hand, it is unrealistic to expect the government leader to follow people’s will blindly because people are often divided and ill-informed over important social issues, especially when it comes to science and technology. For example, despite the advance of genetic engineering over the past decades, some people still share the fare of genetically modified food. Some people suggest to prohibit the genetically modified food to the market, others are willing to buy genetically modified food since it is cheaper than original foods. In this scenario, whether the government leader wants to prohibit genetically modified food is according to the leader’s personal judgment, for the leaders can get numerous results from different national labs, where people cannot easily get access to.
In conclusion, while the government leader should always take into account public opinions when making decisions, they should not carry out people’s will unquestioningly because the public is often divided and ill-informed over different issues. An effective leader should balance the two diverting factors and make the decision to benefit the public.
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest prohibiting'.
Suggestion: suggest prohibiting
... genetically modified food. Some people suggest to prohibit the genetically modified food to the ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, talking about, for one thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64432989691 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89118744133 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.983833954 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.875 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248208267767 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948156763459 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430716522424 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151000338796 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00992646094938 0.0667264976115 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 48.8420337079 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.