Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Author’s claim “Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized” holds credence as many scientific theories have redact our beliefs about the existence of world and also provide us a different perspective at looking things, whereas, some of the scientific theories are too abstruse that even science student find it difficult to comprehend. Thus, such theory asset the beliefs held by people about the nature of science that made us realize about world is infinitely complex.
There many discoveries made by scientists to prove the existence of world around us. Learning about the existence of world is not a single process, any particular subject has to pass through many iterations and in each iteration, we are provided with more logical and acceptable truth of the existence of the subject. Consider an example, at the time of Galileo, people accepted that earth is at center and sun revolve around earth, but it was later, Copernicus theory enlightened us with the concept of sun at center and planets revolve around sun. Thus, Scientific discoveries have always contributed in making us understand the world around us. People would never able to know the existence of other creatures which are extinct today until scientists had not discovered it. Discoveries allowed people to construe world around them. Many discoveries had also helped people in making their life easy and much better place like the discovery of autmobile, aeroplanes, etc.
However, some of the theories presented by scientists are to arcane for people that made them realize about the complexity of world around them like “relativity theory” presented by Einstein. Einstein through this theory tried to show the relation between past, present and future but his theory involved too complex concept that people feel it too overwhelming. Back in past, people paid not much concentration on the pattern of free fall of any object, it was later, Netwon come up with “gravitational law”, which made people realize about such phenomenon. Introduction of many theories like quantum theory, string theory, wave theory,etc. which proved the notion held by people about the complexity of the world around them.
On wrapping up, Scientific discoveries have given us much understanding about things around us and made us release about their existence. At same time, scientific discoveries have also made us aware about the complexity of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | salamikehinde | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Cursed God | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | shahryar2222 | 54 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | gbhardwa | 33 | view |
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 55
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow t 55
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 83
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'redacted'.
Suggestion: redacted
...edence as many scientific theories have redact our beliefs about the existence of worl...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...perspective at looking things, whereas, some of the scientific theories are too abstruse th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...autmobile, aeroplanes, etc. However, some of the theories presented by scientists are to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...he theories presented by scientists are to arcane for people that made them realiz...
^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...t people feel it too overwhelming. Back in past, people paid not much concentration on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...antum theory, string theory, wave theory,etc. which proved the notion held by people...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33894230769 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88073356601 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.178699383 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.647058824 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17647058824 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497845738766 0.243740707755 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190745761496 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150982276537 0.0758088955206 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347561907115 0.150359130593 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172265379263 0.0667264976115 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.