Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.Write a response in which you

With the first clear observation of the balck hole, the prophecy of Einstein was finally proved a hundred years later.It seems longer than the longevity of human life while still a short time for the history of human biengs. As my concern, people may worried about the myth of the world right now which could not be fully explained by the science, while we should not take this burden on us as the science would be the engine for propelling the world's development, I believe with the rapdi development of the scicence, the questions at present could be comprehended accurately and precisely in the future. Maybe people nowadays could not see the day that discoveries explained by the scientist, so did Einstein, while do not worry, I am confident with our human kinds. I will address my views as below.

First of all, actually there are some complex or myth confused us, which has worried us for centuries. I still rermemered the first time I knew the sum of possitive integers are -1/12, I was so shock by this incredible number which seemed impossble. While actually there were four Mathmatists who proved this number by complicated methods,but it till needs a long way for all of us to understand this incredible number. Moreover, we are not alone when we get confused with what happens right now, our ancsetor, for exmaple, they must be confused when they saw the eclipse which they considered as the anger from the god. Of course, in every generation, we all have some undiscovered myths.

Always confused by the outside, the fact is that we does not stop developing.

On the other hand, after we began to use fire, our ancestors embrace the new world, more over, not only for cooking, the fire could make forks and knives discovered by them, so the tools for prodction got evovled time and time again after the discovering the use of fire. Yes we as the most clever speices in this planet we are always challenging both the nature and ourselves. Today, as Chiese scientist found aonther phenomenon that we could control a quantum to make another quantum to move simultaneously. This would be inspiring ofr all of us in that this new discovery could benefit us more than the use of fire as our ancestor found.It could make aonther scientific revolution when this discovery could be used in more areas.

Acutally some of us would still be worried about the uncertainty that the science brought to us. While as Shopenhauer said, every man recognizes the limit of his sights is the limit of the world. We should be more openand brave to the future and the uncertainty due to what our human beings has experinced. We have difficulties and worries while our predcessor had, too. They even could not cure the patients wounds without the penicilin. But we all had got through this.

In conclusion, I believe as human beings we have a bright future, viewing back to the history, we had, and now we have. There are some complex and troubles witch the science takes to us right now, while I do not contend we should worry about this fact, we could sovle these problems, in the future.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... prophecy of Einstein was finally proved a hundred years later.It seems longer th...
^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...s finally proved a hundred years later.It seems longer than the longevity of huma...
^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich could not be fully explained by the science, while we should not take this b...
^^
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... would be the engine for propelling the worlds development, I believe with the rapdi d...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I knew the sum of possitive integers are -1/12, I was so shock by this incredible...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...roved this number by complicated methods,but it till needs a long way for all of us ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...sed by the outside, the fact is that we does not stop developing. On the other ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 641, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...n the use of fire as our ancestor found.It could make aonther scientific revolutio...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, of course, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 33.0505617978 206% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2556.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72458410351 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54604549752 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497227356747 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7139740419 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5909090909 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244457395444 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737141399423 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655159554302 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130029871279 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495679940227 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 11.8971910112 244% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.