Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
The statement expresses two aspects of protecting living creatures on Earth. One claims saving every plants and animals is superior to the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being, therefore the society should save them. Conversely, others promulgate that such extensive efforts are not needed, especially at a great cost in money and jobs. Although it seems true that saving those endangered species seems worthless comparing to money and jobs, it should be done because it is a responsibility for consequence of industrialization and opaqueness of possible usefulness.
First, not knowing whether the new species could be effective to humanity in the future, letting them extinct in not a wise decision to make. In the view the science not reaching at its vertex, especially on the fields of biology, it is inevitable to learn them from nature. Each species has untold secrets that may be the clear answer to humanity and not knowing which one would be helpful on what time, it would wise to protect them all as an insurance. Several years ago, the Novel prize of biology was given to Japanese scientist for discovering new medicine. He got the idea of the medicine from the undiscovered bacteria.
Also, human race have the obligation to protect such species because they become endangered by human activities in the first place. If the human race did not hunt them or destroy one’s ground for the sake of one’s greedy mind, they would not be endangered. When one gave damage to the other, it is explicit to remedy the damage, at least show their best effort to mitigate it.
The opponents of the statement which is saving the endangered species is more important contends the society’s first priority is to enhance the participants’ life and if the issue of protecting the endangered species and investigating on new jobs, the latter should be encouraged.
However, there could be various substitutes rather than choosing only one of them. For instance, by protecting the endangered species, the society could gather a large amount of tourists eager to see the one last group on Earth. It would bolster the tourism industry, creating new jobs and boosting the economy. Also, devastating the habitat is not the only option that the industry have. If the factory wants to build the building at the area of where the species live, they could find other better place under the government reconciling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 90 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 70 | view |
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 58
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 83
- Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that region experienced 90 days with below normal temperatures and climate forecasters predict th 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 79
- 2. Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your o 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...s inevitable to learn them from nature. Each species has untold secrets that may be ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04714640199 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75010068391 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550868486352 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3926057066 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273095798978 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764474610068 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928239173702 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151198985239 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107516248538 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.