The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples
shape your position.
As the human's expected life time extends, the importance of education becomes higher because just for ten to twenty years, a person need to learn to basic things for the rest of their life. The rise of importance of education leads to discussion about the best way to teach. The statement explains that the best way is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. I partially agree on this statement, which means I agree on prasing positive actions but sometimes ignoring negative action won’t be the best thing to do.
At the student’s perspective, the view of getting an education, it is difficult to distinguish between the good things and the bad things. Not only this is teacher’s duty to teach about what the students don’t know, but also to give the indication of the rightness what they’ve learned. From the platitude “A whale dance from a single handclap”, positive response becomes significant signs to student that what they are doing is right. Also, it is human’s natural instinct that when a person get a positive feedback from whom has certain level of authority, he or she shows stong motivation of doing it again. Remember at the education institution what we felt when the teacher or professor gratify what we done, it is difficult to deny this part of statement.
The followers of the latter statement contends that for the sake of distinguishing the good and bad, the teacher should give the opposite respond to the negative ones which is ignoring. However, the ignoring action is a passive opposite respond and this action could be ignored by the student because the reward by ignoring such weak respond and doing negative behavior is sometimes bigger than following the teacher’s lead. To prevent this, the student should achieve, more active, stronger respond such as scolding or certain form of punishment. For example, if the student’s minor misbehavior such as not concentrating during other person’s speech is kept being ignored while a person who listen to the speech actively gets an applause, the student could easily find out that the behavior was inappropriate and try to fix it.
However, if the student did something ethically wrong such as stealing other person’s bad and get nothing but ignoring, the student could understand this as a good thing because a bag fulled of things that the student didn’t have is bigger reward than the applause from the teacher. It would occur less if the teacher decided to scold the student who did robbery and warn him this is against the law because it will make student understand that the risk of such action is way bigger than the reward.
I agree on giving the gratitude to students for doing positive actions. However, for some negative actions, a proper punishment should be given to inform student that is bad, which won’t work sometimes when the teacher neglect the event.
- a nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 50
- Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people. Write 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 66
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
As the humans expected life time extends, the importance of education be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... won't be the best thing to do. At the student's perspective, the v...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cult to deny this part of statement. The followers of the latter statement co...
^^^^
Line 9, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or was inappropriate and try to fix it. However, if the student did something et...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction is way bigger than the reward. I agree on giving the gratitude to stude...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09297520661 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79465577759 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485537190083 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2588246591 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4705882353 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150587644093 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755849462602 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938496610963 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109163542823 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979511753748 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.