Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
It is important to save the endangered plant and animal species by investing all our efforts. However some are of the opinion that convenient efforts should be made.
People who support saving endangered species without any financial restraints, believe that it is humans who are responsible for their fate and should do everything in their power to prevent total extinction of a species. They believe that animals offer a useful insight to evolutionary process. Studying their survival techniques (like camoflage exhibited by chameleon) and behaviour (like monogamy in penguins) have been vital in many fields. Most importantly different plant and animal species maintain the bio diversity necessary for ecological balance. Some of the plants are very useful for the fact that they synthesise chemicals that have medicinal value. In the unforeseen future, we can be affected by deadly diseases, whose cure may be found in some of these plants. Also, honey bees, that are now endangered play a paramount role in plant pollination. Their extinction could adversely effect the many food chains as the herbivores will suffer due to paucity of fruits.
Where as, people who do not support funding the protection of plant and animal species reason that these funds can be better utilised for humanitarian causes as people are dying due to lack of potable water and food. Some also argue on the lines of survival of the fittest. It is a natural process in which some of the species die as they cannot adapt to changing environment. The resilient ones survive. It is a process in nature that would occur, even if there was no human interference. Some cynics are of the view that no matter the extra ordinary efforts, we cannot save the planet from the damage already done. However, due to rising human population, animals have like lions and elephants, who prefer vast open spaces, have restricted to smaller forests that shrinking further. Oceans have been severely effected with oil leaks and plastic. Plastic has been found in the body of dead whales that are washed ashore. It is hard to ignore the fact that humans are playing an important part in their extinction.
All of the species combined have not had such negative impact on the ecosystem, as much as humans have. If we can not spend enough to save the diversity, we should at least switch to an eco friendly life style which impedes rate of the extinction of the remaining species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | tulipkatie | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Shivgovind | 55 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 50
- People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your opinion. 70
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 50
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l species by investing all our efforts. However some are of the opinion that convenient...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 555, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...rsity necessary for ecological balance. Some of the plants are very useful for the fact tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 894, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ation. Their extinction could adversely effect the many food chains as the herbivores ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...ill suffer due to paucity of fruits. Where as, people who do not support funding the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 308, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ttest. It is a natural process in which some of the species die as they cannot adapt to cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
... important part in their extinction. All of the species combined have not had such nega...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'at least']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237136465324 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.176733780761 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10067114094 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0447427293065 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0402684563758 0.0444667217837 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120805369128 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0626398210291 0.0406280797675 154% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56824057699 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246085011186 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0984340044743 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0268456375839 0.0249443105267 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0290827740492 0.0148568991511 196% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2442.0 2732.02544248 89% => OK
No of words: 409.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9706601467 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.366748166259 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266503667482 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178484107579 0.200843997647 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114914425428 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56824057699 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559902200489 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 65.3145101075 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5909090909 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6651760541 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.674092028746 40% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 45.2412758391 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.60683760684 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331070378131 0.391690518653 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0770106695713 0.123202303941 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.050433556974 0.077325440228 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.433166582871 0.547984918172 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152347713149 0.149214159877 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117715988364 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483451682728 0.0892212321368 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425910461101 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0922812477698 0.0692045440612 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240976694873 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534265517769 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.30420353982 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.