Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon

That the species are endangered and need to be saved is apparent. However, the debate is no the amount of sacrifice we are willing to make. To spend extraordinary effort to save “every” endangered plant and animal species seems far fetched. Human kind would not take extraordinary steps without benefiting, as we are innately selfish and saving species from extinction does not seem to offer much benefit nor does it seem like a life threatening scenario. Thus, we can be expected to save the dying animals and plants but not at a huge expense.
Practical approach should be taken in saving species that have more chances of survival, than striving to save all the endangered species. Honey bees, for example, are endangered and should be saved instead of lions and dolphins. This is because lions and dolphins are already less in number and their chances of surviving are lesser compared to that of the bees. Moreover, these bees are paramount in pollinating plants and thus have a greater impact on ecology. The extinction of bees is more likely to adversely affect human kind that of lions. Also, there are endangered plants which have great medicinal value. Efforts should be made to save them first. Hence, as many species of plants and animals are nearing extinction, we should prioritize saving species that have higher probability of survival and have a greater impact on ecology.
Measures that positively and directly, affect us, but indirectly help the cause of saving species from extinction should be adopted. By working on air and water pollution, that are of great concerns to humans, we can also impede the rate of extinction of species like salamander, which thrive in fresh water. Restoring forests, will provide us with fresher air —much needed in China—and a habitat for lions and elephants, which have been affected severely by shrinking forest areas. Decreasing the use of plastics and replacing it with biodegradable alternatives will save us on the efforts to dispose plastic, and whales will not die due to consumption of plastics. Such measures that bear tangible results will encourage greater efforts. These efforts will indirectly help in saving species that are dying due to adverse impact of human activities.
Thus, species need to be saved, of which there is no doubt, but we need to be wise in our approach. With the limited funds available to wildlife conservations, efforts to save the most promising species should be made first. Reducing our harmful impact on the environment would be beneficial to us as well as the rest of the lives on our planet.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ved is apparent. However, the debate is no the amount of sacrifice we are willing ...
^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
... because lions and dolphins are already less in number and their chances of surviving are less...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'no doubt', 'as well as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219917012448 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.207468879668 0.157235817809 132% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0767634854772 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580912863071 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0352697095436 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107883817427 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0788381742739 0.0406280797675 194% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.72458227094 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0394190871369 0.030933414821 127% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0580912863071 0.0997080785238 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0311203319502 0.0249443105267 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186721991701 0.0148568991511 126% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2601.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 432.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02083333333 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381944444444 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282407407407 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185185185185 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122685185185 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72458227094 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488425925926 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.3697175169 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6363636364 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8870253116 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.227272727 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.674092028746 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 47.8771043771 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.35172413793 1.64882698954 82% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328709544791 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11305621179 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0687638358294 0.077325440228 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489909328409 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118171212992 0.149214159877 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131841233017 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535032157363 0.0892212321368 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.382385813788 0.385218514788 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0721814261916 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235699418767 0.275328986314 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407080473725 0.0653680567796 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.4325221239 182% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.