Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own

Essay topics:

Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

Politics should have a goal that is ideal but the pursuit for it should be practical. If finding common ground becomes the only aim of politics, then the country loses its direction.
The broader goal of politics should be to make one’s country a better place where everybody is safe, equal and free. Politics should lead a nation towards a utopia where everybody can work for thier dreams and achieve them. The recent laws that grant LGBT community their rights show how through politics this can be achieved. LGBT community was granted their freedom and rights that they deserve after years of oppresion. Politics can strive towards equality for men and women by using tools like reservation, and must so empower women that reservation is deemed useless. Politics can help implement (strictly) equality before the law for all; rich and influential people can not escape from their crimes. Such ideals should be pursued without sparring any efforts as they are not debatable. Also, only through politics does implementation of such lofty ideals seem possible.
In an effort to achieve these ideals, the laws that need to be made in a parliament need a consensus. It is these steps to achieve the ideal, that need debate. Policies that may seem beneficial to a majority might conflict with the rights of minority. Such nuances require finding a common ground and reaching a consensus. If politics is just reduced to finding a common ground, no direction can be reached. Sometime the consensus can be favourable and not favourable at other times. Though, everyday politics is largely a result of consensus, politicians should excercise their own judgement of whether the outcome drives the country towards an ideal place, and not abuse their vote by siding with their party irrespective of the result.
Thus the broader aim of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. To achieve this ideal, politicians should make decisions by reaching a common ground without loosing sight of their main aim.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-05 Lutfor Rahman Rony 66 view
2019-09-22 Sohaib270 50 view
2019-09-15 kook 58 view
2019-07-21 shreya26 66 view
2019-07-03 yds1798 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user phdphd :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eir party irrespective of the result. Thus the broader aim of politics should be t...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254098360656 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.169398907104 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0928961748634 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0327868852459 0.0497285424764 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0355191256831 0.0444667217837 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.101092896175 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0409836065574 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53894016783 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0191256830601 0.030933414821 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103825136612 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0491803278689 0.0249443105267 197% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0218579234973 0.0148568991511 147% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2000.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 331.0 452.878318584 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04229607251 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.410876132931 0.366273622748 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293051359517 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16918429003 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0996978851964 0.132149295362 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53894016783 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 219.290929204 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531722054381 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 56.1486746934 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4210526316 23.380412469 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9604747404 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 141.124799967 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 23.380412469 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.368421052632 0.674092028746 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 46.7261885832 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.66666666667 1.64882698954 101% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447930729525 0.391690518653 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141503824409 0.123202303941 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10226090161 0.077325440228 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.460368757671 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141958385533 0.149214159877 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162622721209 0.161403998019 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930171425788 0.0892212321368 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.325696717311 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0426966916569 0.0692045440612 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338565196531 0.275328986314 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633398402391 0.0653680567796 97% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.