The passage states that woking for four days instead of five will be beneficial to employees as well as the employer. However, the lecture presents a contrary opinion to the passage.
Firstly, the lecture states that companies would be spending more by hiring more number of employees to work four days a week. This is because the company would need to provide health insurance, office space and computer to each of its staff. Additionally, the cost of hiring would be greater as more employees need to be employed. On the other hand, reading states that the employee working for only four days will be paid lesser salary which would compensate for the extra number of employees. It does not take into account the additional costs like stationary, office space and health benefits of employees.
Secondly, the lecture points out the fallacy in reasoning that four work day scheme would generate more employment opportunities. The company may expect its empoyees to work overtime. It may also expect its emplyees to complete the job of five days in four days. Whereas, reading assumes that new jobs will be created and there will be one new employee for every four current employees.
Thirdly, this policy will effect the employees adversly. employees would risk losing their jobs during unfavourable economic conditions as company would prefer a person who works for five days. Also, they will not be considered for promotion as management jobs are better handled by people working throughout the week. Thus their career would not advance as expected. Reading, by contrast, stated that the extra time on weekends would enhance the quality of life for the employee as he can persue his hobbies and spend more time with family.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 66
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 80
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ly, the cost of hiring would be greater as more employees need to be employed. On ...
^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...employees. Thirdly, this policy will effect the employees adversly. employees would...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employees
...icy will effect the employees adversly. employees would risk losing their jobs during unf...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...by people working throughout the week. Thus their career would not advance as expec...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247619047619 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.161904761905 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0603174603175 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0571428571429 0.0435111971325 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031746031746 0.0277247811725 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126984126984 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0507936507937 0.0370669169778 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48128641728 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0253968253968 0.0208969081088 122% => OK
Particles: 0.0031746031746 0.00154638098197 205% => OK
Determiners: 0.0857142857143 0.128158765124 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0571428571429 0.0158828679856 360% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00634920634921 0.0114777025283 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1733.0 1645.83664459 105% => OK
No of words: 287.0 271.125827815 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03832752613 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376306620209 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271777003484 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177700348432 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108013937282 0.113142543107 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48128641728 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.2314807082 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9375 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1794634173 49.3711431718 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3125 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 45.1152003484 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.69620253165 1.90840788429 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.688223152579 0.549887131256 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11170047803 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0768582700362 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52660172615 0.631733273073 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.125780439464 0.139662658121 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.273121624155 0.266732575781 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970020284161 0.103435571967 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370818909309 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0831815190277 0.0530846634433 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.480668610676 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764706081503 0.0528353158467 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.