Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
A country is an amalgamation of people from across all spectrums of life and so the aim of politics and the government should be 'unity in diversity' and not just pursuing a group's ideals setting aside the greater good of all its citizens. An ideal is the belief and principle that guides an individual which may or may not be always right as per the wider audience like someone may be extreme rightist: believes in the superiority of their religion, conservative and dogmatic in their beliefs and conduct. Such a person will never be able to view people of a different origin and ethnicity as equal and worthy. This is not the political ideal that a nation's citizens envision which turns a blind eye to humanitarian angle.
Diverse people will have diverse views, interests and ideologies and a nation cannot function favouring a single ideology. It needs to find a common ground agreeable to most and this is the responsibility of the government. This will eventually define the growth and prosperity of a nation. Consider the field of education for example. The conservatives here would be driven by making the curriculum more biased towards their religion, history and culture. Probably even demand books to be in their language. The liberals on the contrary, would be of the opinion that such a curriculum will only restrict the learning and development of their children and would only breed prejudiced individuals like theme. They would demand an education that considers all aspects right from teaching history and culture of the region to global curriculum which will make the children globally competitive.
Similar analogy is applicable in other fields as well like trade, defence, culture, infrastructure and so on. There will always be a contention between people of different ideologies on every topic which only the government can resolve by pointing the people in the right direction and doing what is best for all. The goal of politics should be uniting all spectrums of individuals under a single umbrella which is good for the entire country as a whole.
In conclusion, since a nation is comprised of people from different caste, colour, gender, belief, religion etc., there is no one ideal that can serve most or all of them. Hence, it is the responsibility of the political governments to take everyone together and united under a reasonable common consensus appealing to the majority instead of fulfilling their own ideals.
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus. 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 83
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 75
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...f politics and the government should be unity in diversity and not just pursuing a gr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as well 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...y is applicable in other fields as well like trade, defence, culture, infrastructure...
^^^^
Line 8, column 31, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...ole. In conclusion, since a nation is comprised of people from different caste, colour, ge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8129775247 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6991498427 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.705882353 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8235294118 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253233230394 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716317627054 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542223876871 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147802996315 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515964484781 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.