The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
A leader is a mentor and a guide to whom people look up to for defining the right direction for them and help them achieve their goals. Thus, leader is someone who is responsible for the growth, well-being and prosperity of its subjects. So to measure the effectiveness of a leader, examining the well-being of his/her team would be one of the good metrics to look at and extending this to a nation, it would mean analysing the well-being of its citizens.
The premise of a democracy is electing leaders for the people and by the people so that these elected individuals can collectively work for the growth and progress of all its citizens. They implement policies and laws, bring reforms in every field concerning the common man from trade, agriculture, education, employment, healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Since all these measures impact the lives of citizens in day to day, the efficacy of these reforms would positively improve its people's lives and their well-being. Even in the ancient times when the concept of democracy didn't exist and the kings and the queens ruled, same metrics existed to understand the effectiveness of the rulers. A kingdom would be called prosperous if the people were happy and well which included access to food, shelter, clothing, employment, medical care this and peaceful environment.
An example of weak leadership resulting in the downfall of a country would be Theresa May who moved ahead with Brexit without proper strategy in place and resulted in huge loss for the people of UK in terms of trade, businesses, movement within UK, job opportunities and eventually their mental well-being. Conclusively, it led to her stepping down from her role because it had a very deleterious impact on its citizen's lives.
One may argue that sometimes even when leaders are efficient, there are external factors that may impact the well-being of its citizens like outbreak of a deadly disease or a natural calamity or a terrorist attack. But this argument is incomplete as such situations are the real tests for a country's leaders. Any such external circumstance would be transient in nature if the leaders are effective enough to handle such critical situations properly and take corrective measures to not let such a thing happen again or be better prepared if it happens again. Thus, it can be concluded that strong leadership would mean happy and prospering citizens and nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | priyanayak | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | yesh | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | anvay | 50 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 83
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus. 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 75
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ent times when the concept of democracy didnt exist and the kings and the queens rule...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0447761194 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84507088765 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549751243781 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.715676035 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.857142857 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22136719516 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725295851138 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654160121148 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136252172986 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632941179704 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.