The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your po

Essay topics:

The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

A leader of the country is called successful only when he is able to lead the country achieving the objectives set by him during his tenure. I concede that the effective leader of the country is one who confirm the well being of the country's citizens but not the one who is well himself. measuring the well being of the citizen is important to determine a leader successful because of following three reasons.

Firstly, in most of the nations, leaders like a polotician, bussinessman or any one leading the institution or the country are found successful, living high standard life, indulging in oppulence but the this does not make the leader successful in actuality. For example, during the rule of Rana regime in Nepal, The ruler family, used to be very rich with high standard of living but actually the most of the citizens in the country were suffering from poverty.

Secondly, leader is the representative of the country globally, his charactersitics are related to the country as a whole but he might not actually represent the diversed citizens in the country. As an example a random sample to represent a population must be selecetd diversely and must represent whole population, but only the leader of the country can never represent the whole country.

Finally, if the leader is not chosen by any democratic means, he may not be loyal to the citizens in the country. For example in autocratic ruling system like in north Korea, the ruler kim only haS the perquisites of living life of his choise, but every citizen in the country are not able to live their life with freedom. So we cannot say the leader kim successful without knowing about the citizens In north Korea.

Although, there may be some exceptions of being the well being of leader similar as that of the citizen in the country, most of the cases are not as such. In sum, the successful leader is one who confirms the well being of every citizen in the country and measuring the effectiveness of a leader must essentially measure the well being of citizens in the country.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-19 sapana 50 view
2019-09-19 Gh.Ne 66 view
2019-08-22 numan947 50 view
2019-08-22 numan947 50 view
2019-08-17 rituj_b 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sapana :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Measuring
...ns but not the one who is well himself. measuring the well being of the citizen is import...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...andard life, indulging in oppulence but the this does not make the leader successful in ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7893258427 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69138505766 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426966292135 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5512710174 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.083333333 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203766046863 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967892998984 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536416019068 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132383762436 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599604534674 0.0667264976115 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.