University education is critical for students to explore the goal and expand their professional skills. There is much debate on whether the universities require the students to take various courses other than the student's field of study. I agree with the statement that students should take various courses other than their major because such courses allow students to deal with classmates who have distinguished majors, and to explore the fields that interest them. My reasons are as follows.
First of all, students can learn to cooperate with those who have distinguished majors. The ability of communication and cooperation could be cultivated through such co-works. For example, in Taiwan, there are many universities that encourage students to co-work with people who have different majors. Those students exchange their ideas about an issue, analyze the issue from different perspectives, and propose a brand new thought about the issue. Those students are able to think outside of the box, and learn how to communicate with those who have extremely different thoughts. As a result, if a university requires students to take different courses, they can learn how to cooperate with others.
Secondly, students might explore the true call when they attend courses other than their majors. Many teenagers choose the field to study because they are asked by their parents instead of making the decisions on their own. Under such scenario, those students could not perform well in their majors and they might choose to quit. If the universities provide the opportunity for students to participate in different courses, the students who had chosen the wrong major would start to think which field is the most appropriate for them, and modify the goal in the college. Hence, these courses are potential chances for students to find the true call.
On the other hand, some people would argue that students must concentrate on the courses that are related to their major and beneficial to their future jobs, because there is too much to learn in such field. Under this condition, the university should assure the students who are compelled to attend the courses are willing to take the job in the related area; otherwise, these students might devote themselves to other kinds of jobs that are unrelated to the field.
To sum up, I firmly believe that students should attend a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Because these courses offer opportunities for students to cooperate with people who have totally different backgrounds, and these courses could provide students with potential choices of the majors they are truly interested in.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 10
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Others believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help prepare the 66
- The rules that the whole societies today expect to young people to follow and obey are too strict 60
- Do you agree with the following statement To succeed in school or work the ability to adapt to changing conditions or circumstances is more important than excellent knowledge in a job or a field of study 80
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview Our citizens are well aware of the fact that while the Grandview Symphony Orchestra was struggling to succeed our city government promised annual funding to help support it 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, of course, as a result, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2331002331 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57615096828 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433566433566 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7695655188 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.157894737 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449671384204 0.243740707755 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162383783785 0.0831039109588 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120694400502 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296288826029 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852871666157 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.