Both views mentioned in the statement seem too absolute and without mentioning any condition. The claim to appeal to the government to preserve all the natural areas is unrealistic. It is true that we need to protect the natural resources as much as possible to make this planet a better place to live. On the other hand, people also need to improve their living standards by developing the industry and building more houses. This is a compromise that we must make in the development of humankind. Take most developing countries as possible, lot of people in those countries still have no enough space to live, and industries in those countries are imperfect and unproductive. The only way to get rid of this situation is to build more departments and factories. Only through this, the economy could have a chance to flourish, and people get better jobs and higher salaries. It is utopian to protect the natural environment by sacrificing much of people's living standards and happiness. The citizens will surely oppose the policy if any stupid governor announces to preserve the environment blindly.
At the same time, the infinite expansion of economic activities with the cost of the natural environment is also stupid. Once a country reached a high level of economics( even earlier in this stage), it should be aware of the importance of protecting the environment. The limit on the people's activities is crucial, especially in present days. The factories now should be environmentally friendly, and pollution must be modified to meet the minimum requirement, the exploit of the natural land should meet strict constraints, and the construction of natural parks should be highly processed. However, all of these should be implemented on the premise of the stability and prosperity of the economic environment.
The protection of the natural environment and exploitation for potential economic purposes are never an absolute opposition. If one government decide to implement one of that policy unconditionally, it will definitely cause a cataclysm. The relatively good idea is to protect the environment, use the land efficiently simultaneously, and realize sustainable development.
- Some people claim that a nation s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
- Motilac is a substance that occurs naturally in the human digestive tract Manyconsumers of dietary supplements containing motilac report significant easing of digestivediscomfort after just a few weeks of use Among Greenhorne residents the consumptiono 65
- Some people claim that a nation s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27873563218 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13679798288 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537356321839 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4648225921 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.055555556 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223499219854 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637656371876 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574787925062 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130074949889 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498149211458 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.