Some people claim that the nation s government should preserve its wilderness areas in the natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain

Essay topics:

Some people claim that the nation’s government should preserve its wilderness areas in the natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.

The wilderness is a home to the country’s wide variety of flora and fauna and preserving it might give the upcoming generations a chance to get one with it. Here the topic questions whether a nation’s government should preserve its wilderness in the natural state or use it for economic gain. Personally, I agree that preservation of nature, is the best way to guarantee human civilization exists cordially with nature for a longer time, but I completely do not want to eradicate the possible and safe economic gains. Thus, I agree with conserving the nature but the all or nothing attitude around it seems to be a stretch.
Firstly, sadly humans are the top ones that nature and its wilderness need to be most protection from. Humans for their own gains have been encroaching into the wilderness, for time immemorial. It started with the cavemen, building weapons to hunt animals, or using leaves to create body coverings. Whenever humans have had an opportunity to exploit nature for their quotidian needs, then have not backed down. With time this exploitation kept on increasing to oil, medicine, barks, animal skins etc. If using the flora and fauna wasn’t enough, humans have now made this misuse into leisure activities by introducing wildlife safaris, nature camping and trails, hikes etc. This dwindles the space for animals and increases the chances of combat significantly.
Secondly, when we start encroaching their spaces, the animals have lesser and lesser spaces to adjust within, which goes on to cause major shifts in the ecological and food chain across the forests. Per instance, lesser forests mean the apex predator have higher chances of hunting down the animals in the food chain, causing a shift in dynamics across the spectrum. Along with that, they will then start coming into human civilizations, causing an increase in animal related accidents every year. The best examples for this are the increased frequency in visits by bears in the USA, snakes and pythons in Africa, or the leopards in India where they frequently visiting human establishments. Furthermore, during the pandemic, when humans were trapped inside their houses, we could see nature healing itself with time. Dolphins had returned to Venice, sparrows had come back to India etc. This is the scenario when humans are removed as a factor, imagine if we actually bolster natural wilderness’ flourishment.
Finally, before concluding, humans are known to usually put their needs at the top, thus the sooner we understand that saving the wilderness is beneficial for us, the better off we will be. The trees and animals are of major use to us, in our daily life activities, like oxygen, barks, domesticated animals etc. Even though most of the arguments seem to convince you to support the government’s attempts to save the nature, but this shall not be done without knowing all the shortcomings of the all or nothing attitude. Saving the nature is a huge monetary investment, and if governments are forced to invest the money into this, then they should also look into safe, regulatory and non-encroaching ways of making money from the wilderness. This will help them generate some revenue, to keep funding this project.
In conclusion, I support that the government should intervene to preserve the wilderness of the nature, but there should not be a carpet ban on making ethical monetary gains from the same nature.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-30 KnockingOn 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user KnockingOn :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2862.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08348134991 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73019052278 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 310.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550621669627 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 894.6 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0264503223 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4583333333 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197248823016 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615942298966 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892755945537 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142498795027 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907765576599 0.0667264976115 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.