The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, but by the general welfare of its people.
The achievements of its rulers could represent the development degree of one country, but the general welfare of its civils should show a nation’s great.
The nations’ achievements of different fields can show its degree of development, such as politics and art. In politics, Bill Clinton built up NAFTA, which reinforced the power force of America and made a big progress of developing economy. What’s more, it also made international influence and promoted the multiple development of other developing countries. Meanwhile, in the field of science, Yuan Longping, who discovered the hybrid rice, meeting the basic living demand of a myriad of people. His contribution solved starvation problems of many poor states and provided the best premise with China to step a new stage. Hence, the nation’s achievements are necessary for the development of the country.
Although the achievements could be the basic development factors of one country, it cannot be the indicator of its nation’s greatness. NAFTA promoted America’s economical development, however, there were still some poor people suffer from starving. Meanwhile, even if the hybrid rice satisfied food demand of all Chinese, it cannot represent the public’s income promotion which causing the improvement of living levels. Therefore, people should pay more attention to the general welfare in terms of the greatness of one country.
General welfare could not only satisfy people’s physical needs, but also the psychological needs. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of demands, physical needs such as food, shelter and employment are all the basic demand; psychological needs such as education could represent the happiness of daily life. Parents cannot afford education of children mean that the children cannot have enough opportunities and abilities to get good jobs, endangering the decline of the incomes and totally dragging on the increase of the nation’s GDP. However, if the government carry out more welfare to fund those poor children, they will have a bright future and devote to the country. Furthermore, the final goal of one nation is the enjoyment of the civils. Without the general welfare, though most people cannot famine, they still don’t experience the high-minded life quality. Thus, a great nation should focus on the mental demands of its people.
To sum up, achievements of a nation can meet the people’s physical needs, and the general welfare can satisfy people’s mental demands. To be a great nation, on the ground of the physical needs, they should pay more attention to the mental demands of its people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | Sapphire0511 | 83 | view |
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image. 79
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, but by the general welfare of its people. 83
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'big progress'.
Suggestion: big progress
...ced the power force of America and made a big progress of developing economy. What's more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...reatness. NAFTA promoted America's economical development, however, there were still ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 956, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us on the mental demands of its people. To sum up, achievements of a nation can ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49756097561 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05880887262 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514634146341 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.065841857 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.7 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272208321789 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957262554464 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106420662921 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211346463798 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106800425088 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.