Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso

Essay topics:

Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The statement mentions that students' academic performance should be the main factor for teachers' salaries which I mostly agree with it. Here are some examples to prove my position.
First of all, it is very important for students to have a good understanding instructor because it can help students to learn better. When a professor does not explain the concepts very well, students are going to struggle with that course for the whole semester. That is definitely not fair for educators at all because students come to class to be more knowledgeable persons. Imagine a chemistry college professor who does not show good attitude when students show up for her office hours to ask her questions. In this case, students are either not able to pass the class or get good grades, so it is a good idea to predict teachers' salaries based on educators' evaluation.
In addition, communication between students and teachers is very important to improve academic learning and teaching. Unfortunately, sometimes teachers may be tired of repeating the same teaching courses over and over resulting in poor communication. Thus, students will not feel welcomed to talk and discuss about different aspects of the course with their teachers. This will result in poor academic performance for some students, so considering educators' grades is a good way to make sure that there is good connection between professors and their students.
On the contrary, some people may believe that instructors' income should not be based on students grades which can be true sometimes. Consider an instructor who only care about money, so he/she will make a class so easy to pass without any good understanding of the course for students. As a result, educators will not learn the concept completely. It is necessary to make sure all students try their best to learn the course especially if the concept is already challenging to learn.
It is a good idea to pay attention to educators succeed to calculate teachers' salary; however, students' grade should not affect the whole amount of instructors' income. The reason is teachers need to make their classes a little challenging to make sure that students learn the course perfectly.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-15 sepnkycehmqcodjefl 62 view
2023-10-24 raghavchauhan619 62 view
2023-10-04 sunnyojh 66 view
2023-10-04 sunnyojh 62 view
2023-09-27 seoul_milk 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Fariba.O :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are some examples to prove my position. First of all, it is very important for s...
^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...r because it can help students to learn better. When a professor does not explain the ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 654, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educators'' or 'educator's'?
Suggestion: educators'; educator's
...a to predict teachers salaries based on educators evaluation. In addition, communicati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 676, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...salaries based on educators evaluation. In addition, communication between stude...
^^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructors'' or 'instructor's'?
Suggestion: instructors'; instructor's
... contrary, some people may believe that instructors income should not be based on students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in addition, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08563535912 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80958239658 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491712707182 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8836805295 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215147688602 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798888241395 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851686689675 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151981122605 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731205590079 0.0667264976115 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are some examples to prove my position. First of all, it is very important for s...
^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...r because it can help students to learn better. When a professor does not explain the ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 654, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educators'' or 'educator's'?
Suggestion: educators'; educator's
...a to predict teachers salaries based on educators evaluation. In addition, communicati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 676, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...salaries based on educators evaluation. In addition, communication between stude...
^^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructors'' or 'instructor's'?
Suggestion: instructors'; instructor's
... contrary, some people may believe that instructors income should not be based on students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in addition, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08563535912 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80958239658 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491712707182 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8836805295 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215147688602 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798888241395 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851686689675 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151981122605 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731205590079 0.0667264976115 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.