The technology creates more problems than it solves, and may threaten or damage the quality of life.
Everything has its positive and negative aspects, some has few negative and more positive side whereas some has more negative and less positive side. Here, the author contends that technology creates more problems than it solves, and may threaten or damage the quality of life. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with the writer's assertion because of the following three reasons.
First of all, imagine the world about two hundred years back, no electricity, no mobile phone, no car, no buses etc. We can easily speculate how the human life was then. In order to convey from Asia to America, people had to travel several months on ship, however today, one can travel within few hours. This development of aeroplane has saved significant time and money. People had to send letter from one corner of the world to the another corner, it used to take several months in order to reach the destination. Now, the develpment of telecommunication technology has far more advance then ever, consequently, we can convey our message to our loved one within a few seconds. People had to used huge time previously while now it takes barely a miniute to make phone call, in this point of view, we cannot say it has deteriorated the human life but of course it has markedly uplifted the quality of life.
Second of all, once when there were absence of efficient technology, in order to harvest the crops, it used to need several number of human labor force. But now, the technology has made possible of remarkable both time and labor force reduction. For instance, in our area, even few years back, people had to work several days for harvesting crops, however, nowdays for the same amount of crops, it merely takes one day. In this sense, technology has not only solved human problem, but has rised the quality of life significantly.
Third of all, however, for instance, due to the mobile and computer technology advancement, children are more engaging in such technology and having some issues. In present scenario, some people who are using these instruments excessively, they are developing some mental as well as some eye problems. Nowdays, majority of the people in the society either were eye glass or have mental issue. In this sense, we can say that it has deteriorated the quality of life. However, this negative side is signigicantly less than its ubiquitous advantages.
In sum, everything has it's positive and negativer aspects, the main thing is how we use it. Even those which we consider have only positive aspects, may produce counterproductive results if we use them improperly. Similarly, in case of technology also, the principle is not distinct.
Votes
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 62 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 54 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2020-06-17 | jj2824d | 58 | view |
| 2020-06-17 | jj2824d | 58 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 70
- The technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 54
- Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact on our customers In fact only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating tha 54
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... my opinion, I mostly disagree with the writers assertion because of the following thre...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ication technology has far more advance then ever, consequently, we can convey our m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'several numbers'.
Suggestion: several numbers
...r to harvest the crops, it used to need several number of human labor force. But now, the tech...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the quality of life significantly. Third of all, however, for instance, due...
^^^
Line 9, column 357, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ity of the people in the society either were eye glass or have mental issue. In this...
^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eyed'.
Suggestion: eyed
...f the people in the society either were eye glass or have mental issue. In this sen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, similarly, so, then, third, well, whereas, while, for instance, of course, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97321428571 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69387000183 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4094651216 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.272727273 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245505751088 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766412044463 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148117752811 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134380548761 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100718807096 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.