There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.
The author claims that everyone has a responsibility to comply laws and against for unjust laws. In my view, although laws inevitably will consist some faults and unfair parts, however, to be so assertive to claim that we must disobey unjust laws is unjustifiable and may cause many problems.
I concede that laws sometimes have their vulnerabilities and faults, which need to be corrected or fought against. The fault can come from ideology or negligence. For example, the law in the past which limited the right for women to vote for their wished politician was originated in the ideology of past generation. And, the law that prohibits homosexual marriage is unfair because it limits people’s freedom. The purpose of that may owning to protecting people from having unhealthy baby. But, legislators may unconscious about the genetic technology today that can help us prevent the situation. Thus, these laws had been proved to be unfair and unjust today, and undoubtedly people need to resist and condemn.
However, in general, it is hard to define whether a law is fair or not, to encourage people to contradict the law from their personal judgement can be problematic. Since the norm in everybody’s mind may be different, it will have inconsistent out come for a same law. When we driving through the road and stop behind the traffic light, someone may think it is unfair to stop at the cross without other car but someone may think it is necessary to stop. Hence, the hard to judge a law’s equity due to human’s capricious nature.
Furthermore, another reason to dispute the claim that we need to resist the unjust law is that laws have the purpose to stabilize and maintain the order of societies. Once a law can be break arbitrarily, then it may causes turmoil in the society or vitiate the benefits of the public. Take the martial law as an example, it definitely an unfair law for that it ruins the freedom of human beings. However, it is important in during the time of warship or in a pandemic to ensure the stability and safety for most of the public. In these specific situations, it is necessary not to disobey the law.
To sum up, in the history, there are some laws turn out to be unjust and it should be resisted and modified. Nevertheless, in most of situations, it is hard to tell that whether a law is unjust due to the standards of different people. Also, following the law can help stabilize a society and reach maximum benefit of whole citizens.
- Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress 75
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 58
- It is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public 83
- The purpose of education should be provide students with a value system a standard a set of ideas not to prepare them for specific job 62
- Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy the relative ease of finding a job and the salary they can expect to make Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: OUT_COME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outcome'?
Suggestion: outcome
...be different, it will have inconsistent out come for a same law. When we driving through...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the situations') or simply say ''most situations''.
Suggestion: most of the situations; most situations
...resisted and modified. Nevertheless, in most of situations, it is hard to tell that whether a law ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, for example, in general, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77494199536 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71942976736 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498839907193 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.903870957 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35104878879 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11967054835 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079832306237 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235484500944 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748224927231 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.