There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether society should make great efforts at the expense of money and jobs to save endangered animals and plant species. Indisputably, the work required to conserve animal and plant species is extensive. It invloves a lot of mental as well as physical energy. Nevertheless, it is of primary importance for every society to to make as much effort as possible to save endangered animals and plant species. Hence, I disagree with the statement and would like to counter it with the following two reasons.
First of all, humans have roots in nature. We were born from it and that is exactly why we call earth, "mother". Previously, humans lived in harmony with nature but after industralization we have started to exploit nature for our advantage while ignoring the harmful long term effects it may cause. To illustrate, humans are cutting down forests for all the resources it provides like wood, medicine, food etc. This deforesttation causes the animals living in its habitat to loose their homes. They are displaced from their origins and hence their numbers start to dwindle. This indirectly affects the ecology of forests and we unknowingly or in some cases knowingly are depriving ourselves of future resources. In these circumstances, obviously humans should stop exploiting nature and understand its value. Hence, we should avoid any further damage to the nature and make extraordinary efforts to save the endangered animals and species.
Furthermore, is money more important than nature? Money can come and go, but lost resources of nature such as animals and plants cannot be recovered by any means. For the maximum life span of earth and human history, we have coexisted with animals and plants and thats how we have survived for so long. For example, my generation only got to saw the Dodo in textbooks pictures. There are many such animals and plants about whom we can only talk about now and whose importance we would never know, because they were lost forever due to neglect of human societies in putting effort to conserve and save them.
Admittedly, the conservation of endangered species requires extraordinary effort and well as resources such as money and time. In addition, not all people understand the importance of conservation and cause a hurdle to such efforts. However, such hinderences have low importance if compared to the problem in hand.
In conclusion, although it may seem that spending money and time in saving endangered species is futile or that it has little justification, deeper analysis of the problem and by understanding the relationship that humans and nature share together, one can easily justify any costs that would be incurred in efforts to save endangered plants and animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | AtharvaKale | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Sumilak | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Siam | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of the Grandview Symphony The city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony since the symphony s inception ten years ago Last year the symphony hired an internationally known conduct 58
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 63
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 83
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 55
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk required to conserve animal and plant species is extensive. It invloves a lot ...
^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...of primary importance for every society to to make as much effort as possible to save...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter it with the following two reasons. First of all, humans have roots in natur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...es the animals living in its habitat to loose their homes. They are displaced from th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve the endangered animals and species. Furthermore, is money more important tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e coexisted with animals and plants and thats how we have survived for so long. For e...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting effort to conserve and save them. Admittedly, the conservation of endanger...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e if compared to the problem in hand. In conclusion, although it may seem that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12114537445 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87405773152 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526431718062 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.0552269368 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.086956522 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7391304348 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.39130434783 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237784278984 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673937838411 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776965342496 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148800011774 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899394481006 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.