Whenever we come up with an idea which seems not pragmatic to others people tend to push their opinions on us. In every field whether it is scientific or philosophical field an idea that people can't understand will definitely object it saying it is not possible but we who believe in our idea and think it is possible practically should not take this criticism influence our work. Those dissenters will be the ones who will leave the lasting legacy in this world.
Even throughout the history all the famous scientists like Galileo, Nikola Tesla did not let the people influence the idea they believed Like Galileo was the first person to point the presence of many planets in the solar system other than earth which people during his time thought was impossible and criticised him. In the same way Nikola Tesla was ridiculed for idea that one day Alternating current will rule the world. Even during contemporary world the idea of launching the rocket into space with launchers landing on the ground without wasting them every time by leaving them in space once the shuttle is made into the outer orbit was thought impossible and criticised anyone who says it is possible until Elon musk the made it possible with his own funding. So one can say that even throughout the history all the great ideas were once doubted. But they believed in what they are doing and made their mark of glory.
The problem with this criticism is that people don't want to appreciate something that they cannot understand and will constantly ridicule anyone who opposes the conventions they have. Like the idea of achieving freedom with non violence which was prompted by Mahatma Gandhi was not accepted by many during his time and thought it is not possible to get independence without any violence once Independence was achieved with that practice of non-violence slowly people started appreciating the idea of non-violence and they praised it .Which is quite a irony from someone who opposed that in the first place.
So any idea that one believes will be always be subjected to doubts and criticism so if any of that doubts seems illogical and mean the best way is to ignore and believe in ones idea as ultimately they will be the ones who will leave the legacy.
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 50
- Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students take these classes they ll all be able to get high paying programming jobs and lead fulfilling lives 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whenever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whenever we come up with an idea which seems not...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...philosophical field an idea that people cant understand will definitely object it sa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...blem with this criticism is that people dont want to appreciate something that they ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...idea of non-violence and they praised it .Which is quite a irony from someone who ...
^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Which
...ea of non-violence and they praised it .Which is quite a irony from someone who oppos...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ea of non-violence and they praised it .Which is quite a irony from someone who oppos...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nce and they praised it .Which is quite a irony from someone who opposed that in ...
^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he best way is to ignore and believe in ones idea as ultimately they will be the one...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, in the first place, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79948586118 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4517144965 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488431876607 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.190457401 60.3974514979 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.727272727 118.986275619 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3636363636 23.4991977007 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22942378234 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989087163444 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700836582603 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157677152325 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718628342215 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.