Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Unique ideas are welcomed as well as criticized at the same time by the society. Some members of society believe that homo sapiens having unique ideas should follow them and remain unyielding over them despite the criticism from the other members of society to enjoy the ultimatum legacy, while the other think opposite. I strongly agree with the former point because members of society should respect their distinct ideas to achieve success.
One of the most prominent for this belief is that these ideas which once may be criticised by the masses but get a strong support and approbation when proved in the near future. There is no doubt that society remains always restricted to their backward views and one idea that is relevant in bringing a huge change is not easily acceptable. Furthermore, if these ideas help in the upgrading of a part of the society which was considered negligent by the other individuals of society then they receive a large amount of opposition as it may oppose their orthodox. Thus, to achieve success and to make that idea acceptable, one should not be under confident and fight strongly for that. For instance, Nelson Mandela who is first black president of South Africa faces lots of rebellion to prove to the society that a human being should not be distinguished on the basis of their colour and his uncountable efforts make him so successful and famous.
Although it is true that a change may bring lots of sufferings for the society as it may destroy their smooth going lifestyle and most imperatively for the initiator of idea, still these changes should be welcomed because in near future these may bring change in the image of future and make it a better place to live. To exemplify, Galileo Galilee one of the most eminent scientist when announces his believe that earth is heliocentric not geocentric then he faces lots of humiliation and criticism, even was sanctioned life long prison in his house. But later on when this idea was proved it brings change in science and technology and brings the development of many other theories and concepts which are used since today. Thus, the succession of new ideas bring a dominant change which may be proscribed in future, despite facing criticism one and lead to person legacy.
Perhaps, the most compelling reason is that the revolution is necessary for the world as it brings it with lots of advantages. To elucidate Mahatma Gandhi idea of fighting against British with peace and harmony is respected till date and it helps in the independence of the country from slavery, Abraham Lincoln idea of making country independent from slavery despite the criticism makes him the president of the country. So, the change which is beneficent for the future and the idea for it is made with a good thought is going to enjoy huge approval in future which necessitate the ignorance of criticism once made.
For all these reasons, I believe that the people who believe their ideas to be through must restrain over them to enjoy the future legacy and should ignore the huge disapproval over them. These ideas not only help them but also their surroundings and the other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | sag15 | 83 | view |
| 2022-04-09 | harvey_elliot | 66 | view |
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your 58
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 63
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 807, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...dominant change which may be proscribed in future, despite facing criticism one and lead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, no doubt, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2621.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86270871985 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52442946801 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5475995184 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.176470588 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7058823529 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189444767309 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720605374247 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304761926564 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114436118904 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145671452697 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.