A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow specialized study of a single discipline Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned

As contextualized in the topic, study program for the student should be comprised of ecletic resources in comparison to the parochial of theme to one subject. Statememt cites lot of areas which can be discussed. There are lot of things and elements which one should consider before we get coda of the context. As cited in the context, it says education should always comprise of diverse type of fields , while cites many anamolies and restrict the scope to only one direction. It comprises lot of key lot of irrefutable parts which were not taken into consideration while coming up to conclusion. By discussing into part by pieces we would learn various aspects, which directly or indirectly affects the gist of conclusion.

Stated in the paraphrase, that specialized study program of single discipline would lead to narrowinging the scope of the students but it doesn't cite any discrete evidendence to support the statement. Often time somes students tends to proliferate and have interest unidirection, that may be a study of photography, microbiology etc., to support the statement there are plenty of success stories on which evidence lies. There is no wrong in exploring the broad spectums of the art as it would lead to possiblities of interest, but adding or amalgam of all of them would lead to unconventional mixture of hetrogenous elements in one pot. Education department should learn the possibilties to get the more conventional way of adding to the extract to the context in comparison to move to whole big spectrum for the search.

On addtion to ripes and holes in context mentioned, it is based on lot of surmise that thing students will become truly learned or erudite. To contrast to the points maintained, there are lot various aspects which advocates to that truly learned or erudite person always depends on the thoughts on which his or her fundamentals are. To support to the clause mentioned, lets take example of Thomas Edison, he is the one of the prominent person in history of insventions, he was once asked why you been so much successful in most boring lab works and monotonous experiements, he said I been blessed that I choosed to be coherent and delibrate in field I choose. This was one of the viral enthralling statement of that days. Being erudite doesn't have any set of steps which one can do and become it. It comes of deliberate and consitent work towards your interest. So attributed in the paraphrase, it lead that phrase has been based on lot of fallacies and unconventional thinking in comparison to normalizing the approach towards the phrase.

Phrase also gives definate abilty to think beyond the possibilities to enable thinking which can add lot of substantial data or enable person to get the broaden the scope of study which would lead to flourish beyond the scope listed in syllabus of the study. But being coherant in one stream of study would most of the time enable the student to get proliferated carreer in one stream.

There are lot things which should be taken into consideration, when one coverge for the conclusion, elements stated in paraphrase are not deniable in every aspect but have variety of shortcoming which attenuate the subject of phrase. Gist of the phrase that one can extract lot if coherant knowledge pertaining to the subject which would lead to person become more coherant and attribute based.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...ontext, it says education should always comprise of diverse type of fields , while cites ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lways comprise of diverse type of fields , while cites many anamolies and restrict...
^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...inging the scope of the students but it doesnt cite any discrete evidendence to suppor...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 738, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... statement of that days. Being erudite doesnt have any set of steps which one can do ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 900, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...st. So attributed in the paraphrase, it lead that phrase has been based on lot of fa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ubstantial data or enable person to get the broaden the scope of study which would lead to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h beyond the scope listed in syllabus of the study. But being coherant in one str...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 100.0 58.6224719101 171% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2815.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95598591549 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84390347562 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471830985915 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 892.8 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7087249837 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.047619048 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0476190476 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.38095238095 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10527691273 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352520745716 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323873652066 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641747786682 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362111134862 0.0667264976115 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.