Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
For any student to be successful in their career they should know about different fields. Limiting their knowledge to a particular field may lead to an unsuccessful career. While it is important that the curriculum of an undergraduate student majoring in Science or Business should focus mostly on the subject related to these fields, however, it is also important that there are courses in Humanities.
In the undergraduate curriculum of a student majoring in Science or Business, if there are no courses in Humanities, then the student will have limited knowledge. To be successful in his or her career, a person needs to have knowledge in different fields as it may help in solving multiple issues, which may require knowledge from outside the field of Science or Business and may require one to have some knowledge of Humanities. For example, an engineer while selecting the site of a small project may need some geographical information before making a decision. In that case, if he has some knowledge about geography, it will save time and the cost of hiring an expert. Hence students majoring in Science or Business must have some course in Humanities.
For a person to be a part of society he or she should have some knowledge about society. Such knowledge may include knowing about the history, culture, tradition and other aspects of the society. For example, recently the Indian government passed a resolution to teach "The Indian Constitution of India" to first-year students in Indian engineering colleges. Inclusion of such subjects will help the students to know more about the constitution of their nation and will help them be a part of it.
However, the exclusion of courses in Humanities will help students focus on the subject that they have selected to pursue their undergraduate. This will provide them with more time to gain expertise in the area of their interest. But the exclusion of such subjects can't be justified only for this reason. While it may seem that exclusion of courses in Humanities would be beneficial for the career of students pursuing their undergraduate in the field of Science or Business, but it is not the case. They must have knowledge about different fields to be successful in their career which can be achieved by including courses in Humanities in their curriculum.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-23 | jason123 | 83 | view |
2020-01-08 | abirtanaz242 | 50 | view |
2019-12-12 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 79 | view |
2019-12-10 | Ruchi14 | 50 | view |
2019-12-10 | qwer_ty | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... time and the cost of hiring an expert. Hence students majoring in Science or Busines...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...est. But the exclusion of such subjects cant be justified only for this reason. Whil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04663212435 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87691821813 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417098445596 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0898266087 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.588235294 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224135091975 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883988708179 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071675027909 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155279985214 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050908669723 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.