Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
In university curriculum, an undergraduate student needs to undertake various courses to obtain undergraduate degree. Some of these courses may seem not to be connected directly with their specialization. A student majoring in the Science or Business study, have to take courses on humanities. As these courses have profound influences in the future career of the students, they should not be considered as redundant.
It is obvious that students majoring in particular fields should gain well developed knowledge from their courses. A science student needs to be erudite on science. Similarly, a business student needs to focus on his particular fields. However, this fact does not necessarily refute the claim that they do not need humanities courses too. These courses on humanities may not directly benefit their future, they have implications in building the understanding of the surroundings. After graduation, the student will be involved in many tasks that require abstract human skills. These courses will build the foundation of those abstract skills. A business graduate will add no benefit to the society if he never get to understand how the society operates and the expectation of the society from him. A science student will not be able to add benefit if he has no knowledge of his surroundings. These understandings of the surroundings can be achievable by learning lessons from respective humanities courses.
However, a different perspective is that this courses are not required for a scince of business student. But, It is merely a vague assumption that the graduate will deal with activities directly connected with his specializatioin. Actually, this is not the true scenerio. As prospective graduates are part of the society. The future graduates will be engaged with tasks that require solving many abstract issues. These issues require understanding of the society, a clear conception of the complex engagement of people in the society. So, to be a successful person in a career, one needs to have understandings of the society, nation and ofcourse of the world. Students can only achieve this fact by completing courses on humanities.
Therefore, humanities courses may seem to excess aparantly but actually they are not. These courses are essential to get the benefit from future graduates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | abirtanaz242 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | Ruchi14 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | qwer_ty | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...d no benefit to the society if he never get to understand how the society operates ...
^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ctually, this is not the true scenerio. As prospective graduates are part of the s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, well, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37431693989 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08278701843 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46174863388 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1146858227 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.9583333333 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384565063034 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114191833648 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752585249271 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251763798075 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889993745775 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.