Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image.
I concede with the proposition that in today's contemporary society, people are more concerned about creating an appealing image instead of the reality behind that image. There are ample empirical pieces of evidence which would support this statement, as discussed below.
It is regrettable that with the advancement in technology, we are back-pedaling from the reality and moving towards a fake world. For many people, creating an absolute ‘perfect’ image is of paramount importance. The prime reason for such actions is due to the fact that they tend to compare themselves with others in every domain and always want to triumph the comparison. A current scenario of how the large population behaves on social media is the best example to underpin the statement.
Those who do not have a stunning life have a servile degree of inclination to not depict the truth. They often post pictures which constantly offer fake proofs about the amazing life they are living. This, according to their mentality, eradicates the fear that they would get excluded from those who apparently live the best life. Very few of us might have seen the pictures which depict the reality either depicting melancholy or cheerfulness. We are always shown the bright side of the coin even if it is fallacious.
Many people find themselves in depression because revealing the reality is not what the denizens of contemporary society usually do. Those who are busy creating their alluring image are the ones who are more concern about society’s perceptions rather than their own.
In the final analysis, I would say that in pursuit of happiness, one should always search for the reality instead of embracing the fantasy because the latter might give you pleasure, but its longevity would be dubious.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | adnan_3082 | 16 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Sapphire0511 | 79 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | christine_cui | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | jab | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | 开水里的王老吉 | 58 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15807560137 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82206962132 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9472402506 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.214285714 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205755782182 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634648838297 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112541767661 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119309141626 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111884410078 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.