Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Nowadays the synchronized educational environmental is very complex and one controversial issue is the existence or not in a curriculum, a variety of courses outside of the student’s field of study. A vast portion of academics assert that there is no adequate space for courses which target in other fields of sciences in universities. On the other hand, some experts contend that courses which cover different area of sciences would be more beneficial for the students. It is my personal belief that universities should give emphasis to expertise each student on the specific field of study that he/she has chosen giving parallel the chance for options for courses who target in other fields of study.
It would be naïve albeit for someone to not take into consideration the beneficial aspects of an hypothetical enforcement from universities to students to take courses that cover subjects out of the main scope of their field of study. These courses will broaden the horizons of students and will give them the opportunity to gain more holistic approach in their way of thinking. A recently published survey in the credible magazine ScientificAmerican concludes that actually the courses which guides the students in differential pathways of knowledge are more and more acceptable and the survey makes a prediction that in some years this approach will be the priority of universities.
In contrast with the above argument, prominent academics promote the idea that universities should give emphasis on the expertised courses of each field in order to prepare probably the students for the future working environment. The students after their graduation will face a highly demanding and antagonistic environment in which the specialized knowledge and thoroughly theoretical background is needed in order to thrive and pursue an important career. Thus, there is no space in current curriculums to devote time in other courses of other field of study. For instance, the majority of universities in Europe shape their curriculums strictly to the selected field of study giving some options for some minor courses in more general fields of study.
To conclude up, the universities should give emphasis to provide as expertised knowledge as possible to the students, as this is more important in our demanding working environment in comparison with the broaden education of someone.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 50
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 50
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 52
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 616, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to give'.
Suggestion: to give
...c field of study that he/she has chosen giving parallel the chance for options for cou...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s who target in other fields of study. It would be naïve albeit for someone to ...
^^
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...consideration the beneficial aspects of an hypothetical enforcement from universit...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will be the priority of universities. In contrast with the above argument, pro...
^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...be the priority of universities. In contrast with the above argument, prominent acad...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urses in more general fields of study. To conclude up, the universities should ...
^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... working environment in comparison with the broaden education of someone.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, thus, for instance, in contrast, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32010582011 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01461149704 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465608465608 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5449642682 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.583333333 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23307952587 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969716494339 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328128209265 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146356574221 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545788509763 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 14.1392134831 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.