Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
We have a recommendation that the university should allow students to take their own courses on the basis of their interest in their field. Students should have a choice in selecting their subjects on the basis of their likes and their interest.
First of all, students would be able to select their own choices of subjects. Most of students will select their intended field of interest. A computer science student would be taking most of courses related to computer like programming and computer architecture. This will allow him to study more programming language than a university curriculum may allow. Most university give a choice between two and three programming language to study from. But now a student will be able to study all programming language in different semester.
In addition to above, students will be able to perform better if they study the course which they love. A student loving computer architecture subject, would study further subjects like advanced computer architecture. Apart from this, a student would not be required to study the subject which he didn't like. A student maybe good in writing computer program but he hate writing essays in literature based subjects. He didn't need to bother for essay now and will be quite relax for other subjects which he love.
Nevertheless, there are few loopholes which we have to focus on. A comprehensive and eclectic course is considered good for overall development of a individual. An engineer may not like writing essay but he may have to write a thesis if he plan to do post doctoral in his desired field. Apart from thesis, the given engineer may need to write documentation for any new innovation which he may create. Simultaneously we require a writer to have a little knowledge regarding computer.
Students will love to take courses in their interested field. This will make them more field specific and will increase their knowledge further in their intended field. But a well completed curriculum also has few advantages which should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | _sejaldangi_ | 83 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Honey for Money | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | actwig | 66 | view |
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 83
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the students') or simply say ''Most students''.
Suggestion: Most of the students; Most students
...o select their own choices of subjects. Most of students will select their intended field of int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the courses') or simply say ''most courses''.
Suggestion: most of the courses; most courses
...omputer science student would be taking most of courses related to computer like programming an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... required to study the subject which he didnt like. A student maybe good in writing c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'hates'.
Suggestion: hates
...good in writing computer program but he hate writing essays in literature based subj...
^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...essays in literature based subjects. He didnt need to bother for essay now and will b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'loves'.
Suggestion: loves
...quite relax for other subjects which he love. Nevertheless, there are few loophol...
^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sidered good for overall development of a individual. An engineer may not like wr...
^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'plans'.
Suggestion: plans
...but he may have to write a thesis if he plan to do post doctoral in his desired fiel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...may need to write documentation for any new innovation which he may create. Simultaneously we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, apart from, in addition, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07715133531 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78598829035 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456973293769 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1539426886 60.3974514979 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4761904762 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0476190476 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166904524975 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644716253178 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532174727131 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104796523363 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024781036527 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.