We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
This human world is heterogenous mix of different ideas and beliefs. These ideas and beliefs among vary between different religions, races, political party, country and even varies between different individuals. The prompt mentioned above suggests that it is far more effective in learning from the people whose ideas we concur with rather than from the people having contradictory ideas. I am not fully consonant with the opinion of the author; I will be further elaborating my position on this issue through the paragraphs illustrated below.
To begin with, it is common to have varied views between peoples. If there is common view among all peoples, it would be difficult of trace the flaws of the views. Despite having contradictory views, people from opposing views could point our shortcomings. This way, we can work on such flaws and eventually, make our views further solidified. Certain political party, for instance, could work out on the drawbacks of their ideas when they are attacked by the cadres of opponent party. Thus, the rational aspect on which the competitors attack can be a basis for the improvements.
in a similar manner, as the saying goes by “Beauty lies in the diversity”; it is true that diversity results in favorable results. Different people or group of people would be motivated to improve their views and ideals with a sense of healthy competition between the opponents. One can look on the solidity and rationality of views of their opponents and thus could emulate the better things. In addition, the best outcome come from the cooperation of people with nonuniform instance on particular issues. In the manufacturing process, for example, members from different departments could demand different features on their next product, thus it is probable that product launched would be without flaws.
However, having said that, we also could grasp a knowledge and ideas from the people of our same field on some cases. Some field are esoteric to the common people; only the peoples from that particular profession have a sound knowledge on the matters of the particular field. Doctor, for example, could learn some particular aspect regarding medical aspect only form the professionals from safe field. Similarly, newars could learn their culture effectively only from the Newari peoples. In this way, this example illustrates that learning in some cases becomes far more effective from the peoples of same group.
To sum up, despite several arguments that are at odds with the issue, there are also some instances where the issue is practical; Hence, this topic requires much more expanded evaluation of social trends pertaining this subject. However, it is clear that diversity between individuals should not be a matter of hostility between peoples rather we all should respect the differences to make this world a beautiful place to live on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 50
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 83
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 50
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts 83
- Some people believe that in order to thrive a society must put its own overall success before the well being of its individual citizens Others believe that the well being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d beliefs. These ideas and beliefs among vary between different religions, races,...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...k can be a basis for the improvements. in a similar manner, as the saying goes by...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar manner" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...k can be a basis for the improvements. in a similar manner, as the saying goes by “Beauty lies in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ur same field on some cases. Some field are esoteric to the common people; only the...
^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'sound knowledge'.
Suggestion: sound knowledge
...es from that particular profession have a sound knowledge on the matters of the particular field....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is world a beautiful place to live on.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in some cases, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20815450644 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69406307147 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517167381974 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6155211704 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.318181818 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320743914039 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094538190137 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927961397784 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168681307945 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483795865084 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.