"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views
contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Do we learn much more from those people whose ideas are common with us than from people
whose ideas are opposite our own? The speaker claims that disagreement causes stress and
prohibits learning. I admit that unnecessary conflict is detrimental to learning. However, aside
from the speaker, I mostly disagree with the claim, and from my point of view, we learn much
more from those people whose ideas contradict our own than from those people whose ideas are
similar that we share.
Firstly, the opposite idea helps us save people from precarious situations. For supporting examples,
one need look no further than the drug production system. Posit that a particular component is used
for producing the particular diseases. Recent researchers have found that the component that is
used for making the particular drug will cause cancer in the future. This is a completely opposite
claim. If they prove themselves with evidence, it will save civilizations from critical damage.
Secondly, disagreement helps to find the logical thinking gap. For example, in a debate, if the two
teams are in neutral thinking stages, they both consider the opposite logic about the fact and
acknowledge the gap of their own, which helps to find their thinking gap in their study or fact.
Indeed, disagreement shows what is lacking with respect to the opposite and whether the opposite’s
logic is acceptable. In fact, it helps not only broaden thinking strategies but also helps to consider
true facts in a neutral sense.
On the contrary, under some circumstances, we see a countereffect of the foregoing two scenarios.
For instance, in a television political debate where each party tries to show its supremacy to others,
they become dogmatic at the end of the dispute. Admittedly, if they are not in a neutral sense of
considering true facts, it will deter learning. On the other hand, if they are in a neutral sense and
convey the logical facts of each statement, it will help widen knowledge.
To sum up, unless a person is in the neutal sense in consideration of the logic of fact, I concede
that disagreement causes hindrance to learning. Otherwise, in a broad sense, disagreement helps
to broaden our knowledge and helps to find our gap
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | MEHUL DESAI | 66 | view |
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 50
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 50
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 50
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deas are common with us than from people whose ideas are opposite our own? The sp...
^^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aims that disagreement causes stress and prohibits learning. I admit that unneces...
^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... detrimental to learning. However, aside from the speaker, I mostly disagree with...
^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and from my point of view, we learn much more from those people whose ideas contr...
^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n than from those people whose ideas are similar that we share. Firstly, the opp...
^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous situations. For supporting examples, one need look no further than the drug p...
^^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...osit that a particular component is used for producing the particular diseases. R...
^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs have found that the component that is used for making the particular drug will...
^^^
Line 10, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he future. This is a completely opposite claim. If they prove themselves with evi...
^^^
Line 12, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ap. For example, in a debate, if the two teams are in neutral thinking stages, th...
^^^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er the opposite logic about the fact and acknowledge the gap of their own, which ...
^^^
Line 15, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the opposite and whether the opposite’s logic is acceptable. In fact, it helps n...
^^^
Line 16, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng strategies but also helps to consider true facts in a neutral sense. On the c...
^^^
Line 19, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y tries to show its supremacy to others, they become dogmatic at the end of the d...
^^^
Line 20, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, if they are not in a neutral sense of considering true facts, it will deter le...
^^^
Line 21, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hand, if they are in a neutral sense and convey the logical facts of each stateme...
^^^
Line 23, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deration of the logic of fact, I concede that disagreement causes hindrance to le...
^^^
Line 24, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se, in a broad sense, disagreement helps to broaden our knowledge and helps to fi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in fact, on the contrary, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10483870968 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77797707113 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502688172043 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8799294189 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.95 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.97078651685 503% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 18.0 7.80617977528 231% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300220440871 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760459267326 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141797036906 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789117504052 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123350599696 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.