We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose
views contradict our own.
Learning is an everyday process and we get to encounter different situations where we agree or disagree an opinion of different people, but we mostly remember the discussion when someone contradicts our opinion. Learning from contradiction, is not only used in daily life but also in academics where we discover new ideas, when something that should work doesn’t actually work and we understand the reason why it didn’t. In mathematics, we use the idea of contradiction to prove different theorems and axioms. I am consonant with the given topic and believe that contradiction of views helps to learn much more compared to not being contradicted. Examples of this are witty politicians, lawyers and scientists – all professionals who use contradiction to achieve higher degree of wisedom and popularities.
Politics is often considered as one of the area where we mostly see lots of contradictions and debates going on. Politicians keep their eyes wide open to the oppositions and try to contradict their views. During this process, they perform lot of research and brainstrom ideas about the topic. They therefore gain insights about both aspects of the topic and express their opinion. Politicians like Barak Obama are examples of people who analyze contradicions, evaluate both aspects of it and finally act sagaciously. This is not to say that without contradictions we cannot learn. We have examples where occupations like teaching don’t face much contradictions but are intelligent. But the politicians are more powerful and respectful and are more prescient than teachers.
Another example is a lawyer where he contradicts the opposition’s argument everyday and tries to learn about the consequences and results of it. This makes him more artful and makes him more wiser. During the process of defending the client, the lawyer seeks every possible way to contradict another party. This directly enhances his research and analysis about the topic. He studies about every single way he can get defeted and looks himself from the eyes of the opponent. This makes the lawyer learn more about the topic and helps to imrove his abilities.
Scientists are another type of people who always seek for contradictions. They find the topic of research by contradicting the idea given by scientists in the past. They try to contradict the old idea or hypothesis and bring new prespective of idea. They research about what was assumed and outcome of past and what they should do next to bring new desired result.
Many might argue that contradicting idea can discourage learning and research. While it’s impossible to definitely disprove this assertion and it may be true that contradicting can deterioate learning, but many examples point that contradictions are necessary and are the quicker process of learning. We all face contradictions in our home, professions and everywhere. We mostly remember only those moments and lessons when someone contradicted us and we were forced to learn more about our view of the topic. The examples of politicians, lawyers and scientists prove this. All of these can learn by themselves but are more intelligent when contradictions become their part of life.
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge andexperience to that field of study. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own. 50
- Youngtown wildlife 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...cupations like teaching don't face much contradictions but are intelligent. But...
^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...tradicts the opposition's argument everyday and tries to learn about the consequenc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'wiser' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: wiser
...his makes him more artful and makes him more wiser. During the process of defending the cl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...esis and bring new prespective of idea. They research about what was assumed and out...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...o next to bring new desired result. Many might argue that contradicting idea can disco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, if, look, may, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 37.0 14.8657303371 249% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2716.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29434697856 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07206291188 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487329434698 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4224456973 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6551724138 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6896551724 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24137931034 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302378783389 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805817950729 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633255543603 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167593841992 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821597477299 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.