We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.
As humans, and especially in the catholic frame of life, we all face occurrences and benefit from a form of empiricism, also called personal experiences. The author purports that the most difficult these would be, the more they tend to befit us. After expounding on a sample of various scenarios, it would be clear that the statement finds wide merits, and I am personally inclined to assent to it.
It is essential to note that the threshold over which a happenstance would be perceived as a struggle heavily depends on the nature of individuals. While some might be affected by the minor mishap, others are sturdier and unless great trouble, don’t feel anything being hard to deal with. Such a feeling, though, irrespectively of the actual vicissitude’s difficulty, truly provides people with great lessons. Indeed, when we struggle with our limitations, we take advantage of our best qualities and deepest resources; and the very nature of each persona can be uncovered. It is a unique way to stress our shortcomings, and leaves scant space for cowardice, complacency or other personal subterfuges we use to conceal them. In straining in the personal or professional frame, not only would we optimise our qualities, but we also combat our inherent flaws with the glimmer that they would vanish once the fight done. These few instances highlight how important it is to be under pressure or duress, for we get to know ourselves with a profundity that wouldn’t have been reachable, had we stayed in our comfortable seat.
« When we embrace struggles, it’s freeing » these few words from Jo Boaler, illustrious writer, captured my view on the issue raised. Enjoying our successes don’t call for such inner journeys, and might even have the reverse effect. Notwithstanding there is no doubt regarding the satisfying taste of our reward’s fruition, I strongly reckon that the relish of such situations tend to be harmful and cause us to be self-sufficient. This phenomenon is easily perceivable in many social strata, and from the most esteemed sport champions to the greatest scholars of our world, there is an underlying pattern that shores up the view put forth: their first thoughts when reminiscing about their life go towards their hardship. At a wide scale, say for a whole country, it is the predicaments in which were mired our forefathers that most undergird our culture, providing then unremitting source of life lessons. Consider the horrid debasement suffered by the Americans under the regime of the Grand Britain. The free spirit and the independence that are nowadays prevalent in the country, and which our society will be ad vitam aeternam imbued with, come from this gloomy tunel they went through, not from the outcome per se.
Another insightful lens from which addressing this topic is by juxtaposing two successes of a very same person, the first without manifest difficulties, nay facile, and the other far harder to reach. There is no one who’d better epitomise this duality than does Liz Hartel. Her first success, which is also the reason for her prominence, was as a reputable jockey. Without undermining this gifted young lady’s astonishing performances, all her achievements were nothing but jejune compared to the insurmountable quandary she had been struggling to overcome a few years after. After a terrible accident, she was indeed supposed to be lame for the rest of her life. As a mettle and resourceful person though, she managed to ride a horse again, which is the most arduous hike of her life. Not only she has learned her most valuable lessons from struggling with her limitations, but this also constitutes a source of inspiration and colourful perspectives for all.
To conclude, while it is true that success is the tip of the iceberg, often then most obvious and then the easiest part to envy or admire, I truly believe that only when struggling with their limitations, will people grow and improve as individuals.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
2023-09-22 | Bidusik47 | 70 | view |
2023-09-01 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
2023-07-17 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
2023-06-29 | Ankita2904 | 66 | view |
- Some people claim that a nations s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain 83
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 83
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 83
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...acency or other personal subterfuges we use to conceal them. In straining in the pe...
^^^
Line 7, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dent, she was indeed supposed to be lame for the rest of her life. As a mettle an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, then, while, no doubt, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 33.0505617978 227% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3333.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 656.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08079268293 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06087906887 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88787232574 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 369.0 215.323595506 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 1007.1 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4935360581 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.32 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.24 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368280687746 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880344525009 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708448341186 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167863857254 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092282536811 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 189.0 100.480337079 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.