We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.
The issue argues that we learn most valuable lesson in life from strugging with our limitations rather than enjoying our successes. It is agreeable that the byproduct of our achievements are sweet, since it typically follows fame and wealth. However, what we really learn on our life is usually from hardships we face. Therefore, I agree with the claim above.
Admittedly, success can be the goal in our lives. What we see successful peoples in media, aggrandize this assertion. Luxurious life of a star, acknowledge of the public, fancy styles or whatever you might think of, is quite captivating. Without these sweet future outcome, no one will endure the hardship we struggle in our current lives. Therefore, some might think that the future success is the fundamental reason for persevering current hardship, and in conclusion the reason for the dissent from the assertion above.
Even though, enjoying success might influence us on learning valuable lessons, what we actually learn in our lives are directly related to our hardship we face on our limitations. Most of our improvements are made during efforts to overcome the current limitations. We learn what we lack in our current situation by introspecting ourselves. We find solution by knowing our flaws and overcoming them. We learn important aspects of cooperation, trust, or maybe even love during this struggle.
Moreover, being satisfied in our current success and giving up further improvements on our flaws might be nocuous. It can even prevent better lives. What if Elon Musk became satisfied in his success on Paypal? What if Thomas Edison became satisfied with his previous inventions? There will be no Tesla or SpaceX. There will be no lightbulbs and other masterpiece inventions. These cases not only lose possible greater fame what these people will gain but also deteriorate many people's lives. These cases show that just enjoying the success without further struggle might be harmful and nothing to learn.
In conclusion, it is agreeable that the future byproduct of success can influence enduring current unpleasent situation that let us learn valuable lessons. However, what we can learn is actually from the present hardships what we encounter. Therefore, stuggling with our limitation is more essential in learning valuable lessons than the enjoyment of our success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | Bidusik47 | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Ankita2904 | 66 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people should always tell the truth
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 60
- While some leaders in government sports industry and other areas attribute their success to a well developed sense of competition a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... knowing our flaws and overcoming them. We learn important aspects of cooperation,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75363000823 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501333333333 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5568440587 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53612406202 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153838096699 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173634876477 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351362044962 0.150359130593 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175649529453 0.0667264976115 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... knowing our flaws and overcoming them. We learn important aspects of cooperation,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75363000823 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501333333333 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5568440587 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53612406202 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153838096699 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173634876477 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351362044962 0.150359130593 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175649529453 0.0667264976115 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.