"We learn through direct experience; to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all."
In general, almost all the activities we carry out while growing, working and developing are predicated from experience of the theoretical statements. Sometimes the knowledge could be gained by learning experimentally and not knowing things theoretically.
Experience also gives us confidence to move forward with any type of activity. The theoretical content gives us knowledge how to go ahead experimentally. So to execute any task, the theoretical knowledge also plays an equal role along with the experimental knowledge. For example, while studying any core subject we study both theory and laboratory parts. The theory part helps us to understand the reason behind any statement. We do experiments to understand how the theory works. The experiment is also a proof that supports the theory we learnt.
However, we do not acquire all the skills by experimenting. Sometimes we carry out with theoretical prospects because they are already proven before by some scientists or people while or before we were born. For instance, there are many universal facts that do not need proofs, such as “the sun rises in the east”, “humans are mortals”, etc. Some statements are just truths or facts that we follow during parent’s upbringing.
In some situations, we meet the theoretical statements along with their proofs. In this case, we call them theorems and it would be inessential to prove them experimentally. However, we may face some circumstances where the given theorems do not work. In these cases, experimenting plays a key role to derive the controversy for that theorem.
In conclusion, both theoretical and experimental knowledge is very important for a human being. People commit many mistakes in their daily lives however, they make amends according to their experiences as the activities we do are our daily experiments to the theoretical truths and facts we learn.
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 50
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 50
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35451505017 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10469508218 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551839464883 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4828347297 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2631578947 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195613649025 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656409798161 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560819560457 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115109211676 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305433654199 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.