The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Questioning is a natural human tendency. It is derived due to curiosity among the people. This attitude has come a long way and is an important factor for the tremendous progress achieved through the ages. Similarly, it plays its part for a well-functioning society.
Questioning the authority has tremendous effects. It exposes the inefficiencies of the authority and brings those problems or the issues which were never thought of. It gives an opportunity to the people in the society to come up with their own thinking of how the system should work, even the authority has to answer the public to remain on a safer side. The real problems are addressed in real time rather than being ignored off. This was one of the important reasons for the colonies to be freed from their rulers. The growing dissatisfaction due to the atrocities committed were bubbled up and eventually the authority was questioned. And this led to multiple revolutionary movements which ultimately led to the independence of the colonies. It would have never had happened and even till now the colonial attitude would have persisted if no one had the audacity to ask for the justification of the actions from their rulers.
The tendency of questioning eliminates the monotony among the society, resulting in a more proactive society. The dynamic personalities are brought up and they become an inspiration for the generations to follow. For example the way Mahatma Gandhi led the freedom struggle for India is an exemplary model of peaceful leadership. This results in sowing of core values in the society having long term positive effects. The people become more aware of their rights and start exercising them in a better way. Any amount of disorder and dissatisfaction prevailing in the society van be eliminated through the questioning the authority.
Thus, an overall positive effect is detrimental which creates a stable and dynamic society and the authority, too, can function in a better way due to a two-way interaction with the public.
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 58
- It is important to keep your old friends than is to make new friends. 70
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagreewith the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.In developing and supp 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, thus, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08408408408 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98182623305 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528528528529 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3645246078 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1052631579 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57894736842 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155988093327 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456881408869 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317444306394 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959758290365 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121680563267 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.