The evolving in the quality of life within a society is a matter that everybody should be concerned about. To challenge the relations of power stablished within a nation might be seen as a way to improve the welfare of a society since it’s a way to question an abusive and unfair authority.
One may say that it’s dangerous to try to change things trough questioning authority. The hierarchy of power is stablished to protect all of us and try to challenge it might imperil the members that belong to a certain group. In this sense, there is a narrative that states people should try to evolve within society without making disturbances in it basis. Hobbs, the famous political philosopher, stated in his “Leviathan” that without authority one person could not protect himself from other’s man unjust ambitious which creates a necessity to be respectful towards stablished authorities.
However, there is a classic question, which is: “Who control the vigilantes?”. If there is an authority that is abusive and unfair should we respect it just because there is a hierarchy stating that we should do it? Sometimes in order to have an improvement in quality of life it’s necessary to discuss and question these authorities. Take the example of the French Revolution. While the outcomes of this political event resulted in a series of violent riots, French people started to question the authority of the Absolutist Monarchy which lived a luxury life while the people was starving and paying high taxes. This process of questioning authority allowed the French people to change the political system of the country which resulted in some important changes. One of them was the creation of a public educational system that allowed poor children to go to school.
A more contemporary example is the movement called “Black Lives Matter” from the United States. This movement started to challenge government and police authorities toward episodes of racism and brutal violence against black people. This raised a profound discussion within society and many considers that this political movement was extremely necessary in order to try to have a better well-being for black people in this country considering they in general suffers a lot with racism and violence from the ones who should provide and offer support for them.
In conclusion, one may see that is important sometimes to question stablished authorities with the objective to improve the well-being in a certain group. Sometimes an authority presents deviations that should be changed and instead of offer support and freedom it might be abusive and violent. In this sense, an improvement in quality of life would come only be questioning this authority.
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 77
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 55
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25507900677 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97990285809 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453724604966 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3403777618 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.526315789 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142958955987 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485054420785 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344455479739 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872408387421 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163333014476 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.