The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises a widely debated issue of that the well-being of a society is intimately associated with the authorities. Indisputably, the people’s representatives can influence directly the life of everyone. Their main role is to create and revoke laws that rules our society. Nevertheless, the statement presents a very narrow claim, showing that the questioning and well-being are mutually true. However, the public life is very complex and various other facts should also be evaluated. Thus, I disagree with the fact that that the quality of life inside a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
First of all, the authorities are the direct representatives of a society. Considering that the statement is based on a democratic nation, the representatives are selected by the popular vote. Therefore, accepting the statement that authority and well-being of a society are linked, in the first first place, people should vote consciously to avoid an excessive discontent and consequently a high hate of dubious and questioning of their authority. For example, politicians on their pre-election phases are always listening to the public opinion to mold their campaign. In this way, the majority of electors will choose the candidates that probably will enhance the society. In other words, people should question the authorities before selecting them. Doing that belatedly may be effective but it is far from the best case scenario.
Secondly, a regime that have a lot of questioning are probably allied with problems and bad administration. For instance, the political world have ways to combat that using a tool called “impeachment”. When people are unhappy with their authority, it could be resigned by other politicians. However, the history showed that events like that demands a lot of time to be solved and the society suffer during this process. So, questioning is important but the well-being of a society could be an long-term effect.
Admittedly, it is almost mandatory that authority should be questioned by the society. This act shows that people are concerned and evaluating the work that the representatives are doing. Conversely, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to contend that well-being and questioning are linked. In a hypothetical reality when we have very good authorities that bring a highly quality of life to its inhabitants, this is a reflex of a good administration and public questioning dispensable in that case.
In sum, although people should question authority, this claim tend to veer off in irrelevant directions when the subject is the well-being of a society. As long as the representatives are doing their job correctly, people should focus on supervise the authority and also select the right people during election. In fact, the questioning should be done before authority assume their jobs to avoid any trouble or bad administration during their work.
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 70
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 83
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 80
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 66
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 506, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...facts should also be evaluated. Thus, I disagree with the fact that that the quality of life inside a socie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 529, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...aluated. Thus, I disagree with the fact that that the quality of life inside a society is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: first
...l-being of a society are linked, in the first first place, people should vote consciously t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ut the well-being of a society could be an long-term effect. Admittedly, it is a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2502.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22315443678 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3605802667 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.08 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.72 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210694353716 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659845022255 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601405875444 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1341187319 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406683022843 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.